No, it's not "option on option", though that idea is cool as well :-)
Yeah, that's indeed a very good idea, thx. So, with this product idea in my pocket I can offer it to the companies and also apply for a good job...
Yes, of course, as it fits wonderfully :)
Yeah, need to find such a firm that would be interested in obtaining the rights of this product idea. Suppose asking for say just a 1 cent per...
Tomorrow, after registering the trademark, I can tell more.
Crowdfunding? No thanks. And be assured it's neither a scam nor Ponzi scheme. It's just a new option type, mathematically solid, and well tested.
Because the new product (ie. the new option type) is a better one over the existing one. But as said, both can still co-exist; the traders decide...
It's at the moment about midnight here over in Europe. Tomorrow I'll register first a domain having my trademark for this product as the 2nd level...
Fyi: "financial instrument" in this context means of course an option contract type, like CALL and PUT; the new one is just another similar one....
This is indeed an interesting question I too had asked myself recently.
Unfortunately I can't pay these guys. Any other alternatives?
I've created a new & IMO revolutionary new financial instrument for the derivatives market. It has the potential to replace another of such a...
CVAC on day 2 after its IPO: stock has risen from $16 at IPO on Friday to $72.46 today on Monday:
CureVac's stock debuts at nearly triple the IPO price Published: Aug. 14, 2020 at 12:21 p.m. ET...
Folks, don't tell me I haven't told you: take a look at this hot IPO tomorrow (Friday):...
You better should read more carefully as I mean making use of the seen imbalance in the current option pricing model, ie. the Black-Scholes-Merton...
I wonder if one can make use of that imbalance in option strategies...? :-) It says to me: never ever buy Puts anymore as the payout is miserable...
It will be listed at the NASDAQ and the ticker will be "CVAC", according to this news:...
Sorry, but this is mathematically impossible with lognormal calculations. And stock prices cannot go below zero. So, it doesn't make any sense to...
Yes, not equal payouts. in BSM, like I'm saying all the time. But in a fair pricing model both should give the same payout, ie. payout for Put at...
Separate names with a comma.