"Imagine evolution." That's the foundation of Darwinism.
Dude, why don't you start a thread that's just you posting to yourself?
America is less about where you came from as a member of a group and more about where you are going as an individual. All are welcome....
Ah yes, the surest sign of an ass-kicking thoroughly received: The bitchy ad hominem comeback.
With any mutation effecting the fertility of an individual within either AA or BB, there is now a new group CC composed of only that member....
No, infertility with A is required by definition. With any mutation effecting the fertility of an individual within either AA or BB, there is...
I appreciate the effort, but there still seems to be a logic problem in your argument. Perhaps you can explain how AA can be infertile with BB,...
There is no such process without species A becoming mutually infertile with at least one of its descendant species AA or BB. So again, you're...
I get the feeling you're preparing to declare victory and flee the field. Your repeated returns to ring species fail to address the logical...
That's right. That's basically a repeat of what you have already stated. In response, I will paste in a paragraph from what I just posted...
Correct, putting aside one-step processes that can't be extended to produce a diversity of species. Note that any candidate process must be...
This appears to be a difficult concept for some, so I'll spell it out in simpler terms. The divergence in fertility between AA, BB or CC is not...
And I'm still waiting for your example of species A and species B where A lead to B by this "evolution" process you keep referring to.
Now it looks like you're trying a dodge. At some point, species A must develop a first member of species AA, if AA is a product of the...
You yourself brought up hybrids. I'm asking for examples, and we'll see where it leads. What's the big deal?
Separate names with a comma.