Well.. you usually don't. But often you can know. I'm rushed right now. Back to you later. You raise some good issues.
Get back to you later. Gotta go out for a while.
Why do you assume that anybody has to decide what exists or doesn't exist in order for that which exists to exist? The universe is brimming...
When you conjure up a mental visual image do you not see it with the 'mind's eye'? You don't hear it or touch it; you see it. Is this not a...
Whatever. A thing need not be substantive to be real. Thoughts, perceptions, feelings, ideas - all real. Anything that exists is real....
Both statements, "I see a unicorn." and "I am hallucinating." are true. You are arbitrarily restricting "seeing" to receiving images through...
Insubstantial makebelieve is real as insubstantial makebelieve; that is, as a mental experience. All that's required for a thing to be 'real'...
Let's say that you're hallucinating and your hallucination causes you to see a unicorn (that isn't really there). If you were to say "Over...
Swedes I've met complain that they're restricted from expressing their capabilities to the max in the socialist context, but compare this...
Main Street owns Wall Street, or a good part of it. Can't separate the two any more. Wall Street falls into a sinkhole, a trillion in pensions...
Maybe, maybe not. Did the wealth go to someone who stole it? Did a little bit of some billionaire's wealth go to a starving single mom?
Morally irrelevant if 99% is going to one individual.
Yes, it's unjust. It would probably be disastrous for humanity. Determining a limit would be tricky but doable. Who, for instance, needs a...
In each case it's a limit chosen by the (excessively) wealthy individual. Such a limit is a pseudo-limit since it's optional and may change with...
Separate names with a comma.