Trend Following Declared Dead By Financial Times

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by marketsurfer, Sep 8, 2014.

  1. tf FT.PNG
     
  2. convexx

    convexx

  3. seadog

    seadog

    convexx that's funny.
     
  4. http://www.finalternatives.com/node/28232

    Another trend fund sucks wind

    BlueCrest Capital Management is joining its peers in cutting fees in an effort to hold on to investors.

    The London-based fund said it reduced the management fees charged by its BlueTrend Fund and a levered version of the strategy to 1.5% from 2% on Aug. 1. In addition, the firm will rebate part of the management for some clients whose investments exceed US$50 million.

    “The reduction follows an assessment of the CTA landscape and in particular the recent migration toward lower fees,” BlueCrest said in a Regulatory News Service statement.

    It also follows a US$10 billion drop in BlueCrest’s assets under management, which have fallen to US$27.4 billion. Much of that drop is attributable to BlueTrend, which has shrunk by nearly 50% since losing 11.5% last year—its first-ever annual loss.
     
  5. Maverick74

    Maverick74

  6. neke

    neke

  7. xandman

    xandman

    Hey, Keith Fitzschen's Aberration is back on the IB system charts.
     
  8. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    justrading likes this.
  9. Al_Bundy

    Al_Bundy

    Surely trend following must be at or near a bottom. Markets are cyclical. It will rise again, just as equities rose after that famous 'death of equities' title in late 1970s.
     
    Ash1972 likes this.
  10. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    Wall Street saying: the crowd is right during the trends but wrong at both ends.

    Many people go "nuts" at the end of bull markets because the ends by nature are unpredictable. They just can't handle the uncertainty so all types of silly and dire forecasts surface. Ignore them.
     
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2014
    #10     Sep 9, 2014