Spoofing becoming illegal

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by TraDaToR, Dec 6, 2012.

  1. TraDaToR

    TraDaToR

  2. 2rosy

    2rosy

    #212     May 18, 2017
    TraDaToR likes this.
  3. Handle123

    Handle123

    What happens if some Algo computer hits those bids nano seconds later? Am guessing longs be scrambling to get out forcing market to go lower, but all depends on recent activity as well.
     
    #213     May 18, 2017
    TraDaToR likes this.
  4. 2rosy

    2rosy

    i was referring spoofing correlated markets. the chance of being hit on bogus orders has always been there
     
    #214     May 19, 2017
  5. TraDaToR

    TraDaToR

    Good question, do you think if you put a sizable order on brent the spoof effect on WTI would be sizable enough to profit from it? IMO Perhaps on even more correlated or thicker instruments it would work but not on this one...
     
    #215     May 19, 2017
  6. i960

    i960

    I think it might work actually. The problem is you'd still get yanked even if you weren't getting filled due to the obvious orders being stacked and pulled.

    One would have to mask it to appear as an autospreader of some sort (which might even be semi-legitimate given one could claim they were trading Brent vs WTI cross-exchange [dumb because the ICE spread is liquid]). I still think ICE and CME would get in touch with each other though.
     
    #216     May 20, 2017
    TraDaToR likes this.
  7. TraDaToR

    TraDaToR

    #217     Jun 30, 2017
  8. i960

    i960

    "Non-prosecution" because they're a bank aka protected class. Such bullshit.
     
    #218     Jun 30, 2017
    justrading likes this.
  9. TraDaToR

    TraDaToR

  10. #220     Jul 31, 2017