convexx's "hitting bids and lifting offers" ETF options

Discussion in 'Journals' started by convexx, Sep 13, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. You gotta be making this up. It can't be that slow at the SEC. If it's a cry for help, We hear you bro. If it's attention seeking, that's messed up. folks send market calls out to 10's of thousands of paid subscribers and never get a personal visit--- seriously man.
     
    #131     Sep 29, 2014
  2. convexx

    convexx

    You were saying?

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/qsoff601rkqrshi/surfer foot in mouth.png?dl=0
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/qwbazhu6oywizyf/20140929_151410.jpg?dl=0
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/vzvr72hf7h6ot0z/2014-09-29_1530.png?dl=0
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2014
    #132     Sep 29, 2014
  3. You were served papers and the SEC rode along??

    Generally, letters like that are sent via USPS. Personal visits are saved for only the biggest of the big. I really have no clue xcept to say it's highly out of character for the agency.

    but, if it's real, that really sucks for everyone. Unless there's something beyond What's posted on elite, they have no cause of action. best wishes to you!
     
    #133     Sep 29, 2014
  4. convexx

    convexx

    It clearly states, "elitetrader" on the last image. Ask your wife to look up the big words for you.

    With all due respect, go fuck yourself, clown. ;)
     
    #134     Sep 29, 2014
  5. convexx

    convexx

  6. convexx

    convexx

    This will be the last trade in which I show actual fill-stamps due to the regulatory nonsense. I figured using accounts not owned by me would be preferable, but it's simply not worth the hassle. They want to names of family members associated with any account showing. F that.

    Personally, I am 100% OTC now. suckonit.

    I will likely continue using NBBO worst-case, but it will massively discounting the return. Or mid on NBBO and discount for likely negative edge.
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2014
    #136     Sep 30, 2014
  7. convexx

    convexx

  8. nvroy

    nvroy

    #138     Sep 30, 2014
  9. convexx

    convexx


    Yeah, I got shaken out of the hedge. The problem was that I should've gone with the 121 or taken the asym to 4100 on body. That's why I went with the immediate hedge from inception.
     
    #139     Sep 30, 2014
  10. convexx

    convexx


    4070.44 HOD. ;)
     
    #140     Sep 30, 2014
    nvroy likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.