Climate Change

Discussion in 'Politics' started by dbphoenix, Sep 26, 2014.

  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Well in that case please point me to all the recent news stories about severe flooding on the coastline in the Southeastern U.S.

    Hint - The insurance claims for flooding in the Southeast along the coast are at a record low for the past decade - both for the number of claims and the financial payout.
     
    #671     Dec 31, 2014
  2. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    The articles have already been posted. You denied them all.

    Have a nice day.
     
    #672     Dec 31, 2014
  3. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    You have not posted articles demonstrating flooding issues on the Southeast coast. You and FC posted articles claiming the sea level would rise by a meter - projections that have been debunked as nonsense.
     
    #673     Dec 31, 2014
  4. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    If you like.
     
    #674     Dec 31, 2014
  5. Max E.

    Max E.

    [​IMG]
     
    #675     Jan 1, 2015
    iflyjetzzz likes this.
  6. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    Old cars banned over Delhi's dirty air
    Vehicles more than 15 years old are being ordered off the streets in the Indian capital New Delhi in an attempt to cut pollution.

    BBC


    Better late than never . . .
     
    #676     Jan 2, 2015

  7. What catastrophic predictions? What you think were predictions were not predictions by the climate science community as a whole but were guesses by individual scientists. Not the same thing. By 1980 the climate science community predicted global warming. They were right.

    The data was adjusted to make it more accurate. To adjust for the urban heat island effect. If you knew the details of what and why they did it you would understand and what they did makes sense. But all you know is what some hit piece on Breitbarf says about it. And how do you know the old data set was not retained? Seems unlikely.
     
    #677     Jan 2, 2015
  8. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    iflyjetzzz,

    You presented a logical reasonable argument. Fraudcurrents doesn't do well with logic.
     
    #678     Jan 2, 2015
  9. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    For example, he will continuously state something like if you don't believe every lie the GW libtards tell you, you are a idiot that doesn't believe in the brilliant scientist at NASA, etc. You believe you are smarter than a scientist at NASA.

    Then when NASA scientist publish an article in a scientific journal that doesn't match his religious GW beliefs, he will state that he doesn't believe the NASA scientist's findings. It is impossible to have any sort of reasonable discussion with someone like this.
     
    #679     Jan 2, 2015

  10. What the hell are you babbling about? What article from NASA? The one that jerm misrepresented about CO2 acting as a coolant in the stratosphere? All I ever see from you denier nitwits like you is bullshit from Breitbarf or LOLWUWT or stuff from that fraudulent fool Salby.

    The fact is that there are no predictions that the climate science community as a whole predicted that did not come true and the data is better than ever. NOT fraudulently manipulated. The deniers mistake their ignorance and delusions about what the science said for reality. Not the same.

    For instance, in the seventies the climatologists were NOT predicting an ice age. More recently they were NOT, as a whole, predicting more tornadoes. There has been some back and forth on it but there was never any consensus about that. The strong hurricanes ARE becoming more numerous. Heavy rainfalls ARE becoming more numerous. Sea levels ARE rising, at faster rates. The world IS heating up and the ice IS melting.
     
    #680     Jan 2, 2015