What part of the word illegal don't they understand? https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/08/politics/trump-family-separation-el-paso-kirstjen-nielsen/index.html Behind the scenes, two sources told CNN, the President told border agents to not let migrants in. Tell them we don't have the capacity, he said. If judges give you trouble, say, "Sorry, judge, I can't do it. We don't have the room." After the President left the room, agents sought further advice from their leaders, who told them they were not giving them that direction and if they did what the President said they would take on personal liability. You have to follow the law, they were told. Ultimately, acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney seemed to have been able to talk the President out of closing the port of El Paso. Trump, however, was insistent that his administration begin taking another action -- denying asylum seekers entry. Nielsen tried to explain to the President that the asylum laws allow migrants from Central America to come to the US and gain entry. She talked to the White House counsel to see if there were any exceptions, but he told her that her reading of the law was correct. Sources told CNN that Nielsen tried to explain they could not bring the policy back because of court challenges, and White House staffers tried to explain it would be an unmitigated PR disaster. "He just wants to separate families," said a senior administration official.h "At the end of the day," a senior administration official said, "the President refuses to understand that the Department of Homeland Security is constrained by the laws."
In other words, it is illegal to apprehend illegal aliens? Is that what you are intimating? Better yet, are you saying a department named “Homeland Security” does not have the authority to protect our country? I believe you are throwing away a promising career in comedy by continually posting this type of nonsense on a trading website blog.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/08/politics/trump-family-separation-el-paso-kirstjen-nielsen/index.html Behind the scenes, two sources told CNN, the President told border agents to not let migrants in. Tell them we don't have the capacity, he said. If judges give you trouble, say, "Sorry, judge, I can't do it. We don't have the room." After the President left the room, agents sought further advice from their leaders, who told them they were not giving them that direction and if they did what the President said they would take on personal liability. You have to follow the law, they were told. Ultimately, acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney seemed to have been able to talk the President out of closing the port of El Paso. Trump, however, was insistent that his administration begin taking another action -- denying asylum seekers entry. Nielsen tried to explain to the President that the asylum laws allow migrants from Central America to come to the US and gain entry. She talked to the White House counsel to see if there were any exceptions, but he told her that her reading of the law was correct. Sources told CNN that Nielsen tried to explain they could not bring the policy back because of court challenges, and White House staffers tried to explain it would be an unmitigated PR disaster. "He just wants to separate families," said a senior administration official.h "At the end of the day," a senior administration official said, "the President refuses to understand that the Department of Homeland Security is constrained by the laws."[/QUOTE]
Even extreme liberal Democrats have to follow the law. I sent a Twit to President Donald Trump 3 administrative remedies he can resort to, to enforce US immigration laws and put a stop to the tens of thousands of migrants invading the US border. I urged him to seriously consider taking those 3 steps to put an end to the nonsense of Democrat liberals open door policy towards migrants! I hope he adopts it because I would love the Democrats losing their heads over it!
[/QUOTE] “Behind the scenes” and “Sources told CNN...”? At least I understand where at least one of your sources of propaganda is coming from. You really have no idea how ridiculous you sound to thinking people, do you? You have a high frequency of low content, at best, posts. It is probably safe to say you are a foreign troll. Not English, because usually they are more educated, tend to write reasonably well, and can reason things out to at least a minimal degree. You are probably not Asian. Russian, perhaps? If so, you are not even an inpressive one at that. Hopefully Tony Stark and exGOPer can help you out of your haze.
You are the one parroting CNN. CNN! For God’s sake. Have you no standards? That was a rhetorical question. I saw RRY16’s post again today listing the many alleged lies of Trump. What struck me is many Liberals don’t seem know the definition of a lie and seemingly cannot seperate someone’s opinion from fact. By the way, just because you don’t agree with Trump on something does not mean he is lying about it. For your convenience, I have pasted a definition of lying from dictionary.com. noun a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture: His flashy car was a lie that deceived no one. an inaccurate or false statement; a falsehood. verb (used without object), lied, ly·ing. to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with intent to deceive. to express what is false; convey a false impression. verb (used with object), lied, ly·ing. to bring about or affect by lying (often used reflexively): to lie oneself out of a difficulty; accustomed to lying his way out of difficulties. When using the definition of lying above, CNN misleads almost constantly with intent to deceive for the political gain of the Democratic Party and their own internal political goals. CNN apparently has high concentrations of a particular race and an unusual number of staff having close relationships with each other. In addition, I heard recently that ATT has an interest in CNN. Remember ATT? I not talking chronic poor customer service here, I’m talkng about failed politician, husband, and character named John Edwards that blurted out something along the lines of thank God for ATT at a debate about the time he was considered to be politically inert. I wonder who helped support this low life’s campaign? This is another rhetorical question. You support half-baked or anti-American causes using questionable sources and little to no independent analysis on your part. No wonder you seem lost in space on a forum that usually discusses US politics.
Did you know the President made fun of the director for the Secret Service because of the size of his ears ? He called him Dumbo.. Anderson Cooper rips Trump for making fun of the Secret Service director’s ears “It’s quite a day when multiple sources say the president of the United States told border agents to break the law and that’s not the biggest story. That’s just sort of a dash of color in a much larger story, but that is where we are tonight,” he said. “We appear to be in the middle of what one senior official tells CNN is a ‘near-systematic purge’ at the Department of Homeland Security.” He continued: “DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen is out, her deputy’s been bypassed perhaps unlawfully by the naming of an acting successor. The director fo the Secret Service, which is part of DHS, has also been fired, two officials telling the New York Times that the president has been making fun of him lately, calling him ‘Dumbo’ because of the size of his ears. Consider that for a second. The president of the United States is reportedly making fun of a man charged with protecting him and his family because of the size of his ears.
Maybe Dumbo and his ears should duck next time a bullet is heading his way and see if fatso can save himself...