Tracking Obamacare Signups: Total as of March 9, 2014: (10.7 M - 13.1 M)

Discussion in 'Politics' started by exGOPer, Mar 10, 2014.

  1. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Private QHPs: (3.66M - 4.74M) • Medicaid/CHIP: (3.92M - 5.29M) • Sub26ers: 3.10M

    Enrollment Period Elapsed: 87.4% • CBO QHP Projection Attained: 60.1% (or 70.1%)

    February Exchange-Based QHP Projection (Feb. 2 - Mar. 1): 902,000
    Total Exchange-Based QHP Projection (Oct. 1 - Mar. 1): 4,202,000

    http://acasignups.net/
     
  2. Lucrum

    Lucrum

  3. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    And what has that got to do with Obamacare? Obama was not even President in 2008, ACA passed in 2010 and the signups started last year.

    SInce Obamacare sign up started in 2013 , the uninsured rate has FALLEN but your article is a nice spin too. Reminds me of the whole 'unskewed' poll campaign and how you guys twisted everything into good news for yourself till reality smacked your face.


    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?p=3950931#post3950931
     
  4. jem

    jem

    so when you subtract out the categories that are not really relevant to obamacares mission you have what 4 million to 5 million.... and how many were kicked off insurance plans so far? 6 million?
     
  5. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    xGOPher has no interest in facts or reality. He's too busy sucking Obama's dick.
     
  6. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Yea, tracking uninsured rate since the program to bring down the uninsured rate is 'not factual'

    You Cons do dream a lot about black dicks, why is that. Get out of the closet already, aren't you too old to live this fake life.

    [​IMG]
     
  7. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    The Obamacare mission is to expand insurance coverage, why subtract 'other categories'?

     
  8. JamesL

    JamesL

    the site is run by a guy from Daily Kos - draw your own conclusions
     
  9. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    The site backs up every number they post with references and has been cited by many mainstream outlets.
     
  10. jem

    jem

    because they destroyed a system was working for most and could have been supplemented to improve those non core categories for a fraction of the cost and with zero destruction of liberty.
    or they could have left things the way they were and developed a plan to cover the uninsured.

     
    #10     Mar 11, 2014