Obama Signs Actions Taking Aim At Gender Pay Gap. WASHINGTON (AP) â President Barack Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress are making a concerted election-year push to draw attention to women's wages, linking Obama executive actions with pending Senate legislation aimed at closing a compensation gender gap that favors men. Obama on Tuesday planned to sign an executive order prohibiting federal contractors from retaliating against workers who discuss their pay. He also was to direct the Labor Department to issue new rules requiring federal contractors to provide compensation data that includes a breakdown by race and gender. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/08/obama-pay-equity_n_5112161.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
WASHINGTON -- Democrats' push for pay equity between men and women is "condescending," one of the top women in the House Republican leadership argued Tuesday, suggesting that the campaign for equal pay for equal work reflects a lack of understanding of women's contributions to the workforce. She went on to suggest that Democrats who don't see it her way are looking down on women. "Many ladies I know feel like they are being used as pawns, and find it condescending [that] Democrats are trying to use this issue as a political distraction from the failures of their economic policy," Jenkins said. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/08/equal-pay-republcans_n_5111730.html
Maybe Obama should worry about his own backyard first..... As Obama Spotlights Gender Gap in Wages, His Own Payroll Draws Scrutiny By MICHAEL D. SHEAR and ANNIE LOWREYAPRIL 7, 2014 WASHINGTON â President Obama on Tuesday will call attention to what he has said is an âembarrassmentâ in America: the fact that women make, on average, only 77 cents for every dollar that a man earns. But critics of the administration are eager to turn the tables and note that Mr. Obamaâs White House fares only slightly better. A study released in January showed that female White House staff members make on average 88 cents for every dollar a male staff member earns. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/u...-in-wages-his-own-payroll-draws-scrutiny.html
"Obama's executive order and directive to the Labor Department dovetailed with the start of Senate debate on broader legislation that would make it easier for workers to sue companies for paying women less because of their gender. That legislation is expected to fail, as it has in the past, due to Republican opposition."
<iframe title="MRC TV video player" width="640" height="360" src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/126420" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
On Tuesday's New Day, CNN's John King targeted President Obama and his administration for their "textbook case...of do as I say, not as I do" on the issue of equal pay for women. After playing a clip of Press Secretary Jay Carney playing up how the 88 cents on the dollar women in the White House apparently make compared to men is "better than the national average," King quipped, "I guess the coach would say, is that the best you got?" <iframe title="MRC TV video player" width="640" height="360" src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/126436" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
"Obama's executive order and directive to the Labor Department dovetailed with the start of Senate debate on broader legislation that would make it easier for workers to sue companies for paying women less because of their gender. That legislation is expected to fail, as it has in the past, due to Republican opposition."
Obama getting destroyed by everyone in the media with his fake war on women meme, nice to see the press doing their job for once, too bad its a day late and a dollar short. Video at the link provided below. Former Obama Officialâs Paycheck Fairness Talking Points Demolished in CNN Brawl Anita Dunn, a veteran Democratic operative and a former White House communications director in Barack Obamaâs administration, did not perform all that well when tasked with defending the presidentâs election year push for a variety of remedies to the issue equal pay for women. To the extent that this an issue at all, which Dunn failed to prove, she also was unable to demonstrate that the White Houseâs proposed solutions would even address the issue without creating new, far more tangible problems for employers and employees alike in the process. After CNN host Jake Tapper noted that it is already illegal under the National Labor Relations Act to punish one employee for disclosing what they make to another employee, Dunn sidestepped the issue by saying that it was nevertheless difficult to have those conversations with co-workers. She did not, however, outline how a presidential order would address the perennial problem of awkward conversations. Not only did Dunn burst out of the gate by failing to comprehensively address Tapperâs question, she undermined the White Houseâs effort to create hostility between employer and employee when she said that compensation disparity most likely occurs without the employer even being aware of it. âMost contractors are probably not even aware if they have these disparities,â Dunn said. âAnd after you control for seniority and after you control for performance, and all the other things that go into pay, if you still have a disparity you want to ask yourself, âWhy is it?ââ Tapper noted that a recent study revealed that the White House, too, does not pay women on average as much as men. The Heritage Foundationâs The Foundry senior contributor, Genevieve Wood, observed that the White Houseâs defense is the same as the private sectorâs â that the calculation which asserts that women make 77 cents for every dollar men make is flawed. Wood added that this kind of flawed calculation might discourage young women from entering the workforce or asking their employer for the salary they deserve. âWe ought to be celebrating where women are, not telling them that theyâre down where they shouldnât be,â Wood said. Dunn made a vital counterpoint here, noting that Wood was correct about young women but incorrect about women of child-rearing age and older. But after this moment, the wheels fell off. âIn the private sector, youâre still going to have â youâre going to have more men at senior levels,â Dunn asserted. âIf you look at corporate boards, for example, women are still only 17 percent of corporate boards.â Wood noted that Dunn had diverged entirely from the subject at hand by shifting from equal pay to complete equality of employment along gender lines, and shifted the conversation back to equal pay. Wood then asserted, based on a Department of Labor study, equal pay already exists. âAccording to the department of labor who did the study in 2009, if you compare job to job, experience to experience and you break the same experience to the table, they are making the same,â Wood said. Finally, Wood and Dunn engaged in a rhetorical brawl over the need for the proposed Paycheck Fairness Act. Wood said that this legislation encourages employees, men and women, to sue their employers and discourages employers from giving raises or bonuses based on performance. To counter this valid point, Dunn fired the last salvo in her arsenal. She began by accusing Wood of deviating from the issue at hand, a tactic that Dunn had, in fact, resorted to on multiple occasions throughout the interview. Finally, Dunn whimsically insisted that the Paycheck Fairness Act is nothing more than a toothless, unenforceable guideline designed encourage employers to not discriminate against women. Wood, admirably, did not let this misleading assertion stand. Woodâs performance was forceful, and she routinely interrupted Dunn â a level of assertiveness for which the former White House official seemed unprepared. Furthermore, Woodâs command of the data surrounding employee compensation rates was strong but not reflective of years of research on the subject. Even so, Dunn was unable to counter most of her assertions. That could be due to the fact that her arguments are simply not that convincing. When faced with even a cursory counterargument, the administrationâs effort to reanimate the War on Women crumbles. In the absence of a Todd Akin-like figure to make their arguments for them, it is possible that the White House is simply ill-suited to mount a convincing claim that such a war even exists. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/former-o...-brawl/#ooid=dkaDB2bDqekWVGpjf63GRlhcXo08d6C2
Reps getting destroyed by everyone in the media with their real war on women, nice to see the press doing their job for once, too bad its a day late and a dollar short. Senate Republicans Block Paycheck Fairness Act For Third Time Laura Bassett 04/09/2014 "Senate Republicans blocked a vote on Wednesday to open debate on the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would hold employers more accountable for wage discrimination against women. The Senate voted 53 to 44 to move forward on the bill, falling short of the 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster. "The bill would prohibit retaliation against employees who share their salary information with each other, which supporters say would eliminate the culture of silence that keeps women in the dark about pay discrimination. It would also require the Department of Labor to collect wage data from employers, broken down by race and gender, and require employers to show that wage differentials between men and women in the same jobs are for a reason other than sex. " More>>