http://2012election.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=004491 My results: I was liberal in selecting the neither or unsure option so as not to bias the results. Example, on of the questions was- is the occupy Wall Street movement good for America, the party line vote would be obvious, but in reality I don't know so this vote and others like this did not slant my results. Stein 79% (22/28) agreed Obama 78% (31/40) agreed Johnson 63% (24/38) agreed Goode 38% (14/37) agreed Romney 33% (12/36) agreed
Goode 75% (36/48) agreed Johnson 73% (36/49) agreed Romney 65% (30/46) agreed Stein 57% (20/35) agreed Obama 43% (21/49) agreed The problem with this test is that each question is weighted evenly, and that shouldn't be the case. For instance, my belief on taxes is much stronger than my belief on whether medical maryjane should be allowed.
Stein-77 Johnson-71 Obama-62 Goode-49 Mittens-42 Which is why Mittens does not bother me all that much, even if by some cosmic miracle that he should win.
I agree with him 42 percent of the time. I agree with the President 62 percent of the time. Look, Tsing, everyone knows that Mittens in debate one was the Real Mittens. He should have run that way, but noooooo, he had to suck Tea Party dick to get the GOP nomination. The thing that is going to kill Mittens is that folks are worried that the hard right is going to treat him like a cheap whore. That is what will do him in. As I have said before, I almost feel sorry for the guy.
I did something similar, but I answered every question, so I said yes to both OWS and the Tea Party, which I happen to think is true.
Goode 68% (34/50) agreed Stein 65% (24/37) agreed Johnson 59% (29/49) agreed Romney 52% (24/46) agreed Obama 52% (26/50) agreed