http://www.cnn.com/video/standard.h...mepage=yes&video_referrer=http://www.cnn.com/ My daughter can do 10. She is 5' 4" and 125 lbs.
You ain't seen nothin' yet. Wait `til the anti-fat-discrimination movement gets a good head of steam. Then we'll have super heifers demanding to be infantry. OTOH, maybe a good 150 pounds of lard will help protect them from shrapnel. If one of `em leaps on a grenade, nobody will even be able to hear it.
Decadence is a sign of the top. We are a few decades behind the country that was once referred to as "The British Empire".
They should be required to do anything and everything a male Marine has to do PERIOD. (no pun intended)
That is silly. What women mean they want to be treated equally may have gotten way out of control, for example in this case. But in SPIRIT, what they meant is they wanted to vote, they wanted to enjoy sex without the risk of pregnancy, they wanted the same pay for the same achievement, they wanted access to education, they wanted access to work so that in case they were stuck with some asshole, their children wouldn't starve and they could go on to support themselves. Should a woman be treated IDENTICALLY to a man in the armed forces? Like every other question asked in history, the answer is dynamic and depends on when in history you ask it. The more technological warfare becomes, the less physical differences will matter. In fact, advanced technological warfare is the very reason that women are in the armed forces to begin with. Equality to DO THE JOB.
This southpaw can probably knock out many of the pussies on this website. <iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Di6Zwc21Zbw?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
They have made it easier for Women to be in the fire department as far as the physical part. Not only for women but for dumb f**ks who couldn't pass the written exam.