Short of Workers and Consumers, China Abandons One-Child Policy

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by nitro, Oct 29, 2015.

  1. nitro

    nitro

  2. nitro

    nitro

    It is probably the ratio of old to young that matters, not absolute numbers. China has to sustain a population of 1.5B people or grow it. Scary.
     
    NoVoodooHere likes this.
  3. Cswim63

    Cswim63

     
  4. Cswim63

    Cswim63

    Do they still teach Latin in school?
     
  5. sooooo...

    Any small cap stocks in Hong Kong gonna get hyperbola'd tonight as a result?
     
  6. nitro

    nitro

    That's an interesting question. But isn't the obvious choice anything to do with reproductive science? How about the chinese P&G?
     
  7. That's an interesting non-answer
     
  8. Cswim63

    Cswim63

  9. Cswim63

    Cswim63

    We need the Chinese equivalent of Harry Dent to tell us where to invest. Or maybe we can live without him. Good inference on the P&G. Diapers yes. Who sells infant formula there? Nestle? Or the like. Is there a ToysrUs? It seems like a strong anomaly on the face of it. But I think we need one more piece of info--will it bring a higher birthrate? Most economies which go from agrarian to industrial suffer big declines in birthrate. It also makes me wonder whether all the pollution is catching up to them.--Swimr
     
    #10     Oct 29, 2015