SEC Charges New York Firm Briargate and Co-Founder With Spoofing

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by dealmaker, Oct 15, 2015.

  1. dealmaker

    dealmaker


    Traders Magazine Online News, October 9, 2015

    Matthew Leising

    (Bloomberg) -- The Securities and Exchange Commission charged Briargate Trading LLP and its co-founder Eric Oscher with spoofing in the $23 trillion U.S. stock market.

    Oscher, who neither admitted nor denied the findings, was ordered to disgorge $525,000 in profits, as well as pay a civil penalty of $150,000, the SEC said in an e-mailed statement. Briargate agreed to pay a $350,000 civil penalty, the SEC said. The firm and Oscher must not spoof anymore, the SEC said.

    “Oscher took advantage of our interconnected markets by placing non-bona fide orders on one exchange, and then buying or selling the spoofed securities at artificial prices on other exchanges,” Joseph Sansone, co-chief of the SEC’s Market Abuse Unit, saidin the statement.

    Spoofing has become a growing concern for regulators in derivatives markets after the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act made such trading illegal. Navinder Sarao was indicted in August by U.S. prosecutors for allegedly spoofing in U.S. stock index futures on the day of the flash crash in May 2010, when more than $1 trillion in value of U.S. equities was temporarily wiped out. Sarao, who is fighting extradition from the U.K., has denied wrongdoing.

    Spoofing in stock markets has always been illegal under the Securities Exchange Act.
     
  2. wrbtrader

    wrbtrader

    SEC are like cops going after the drug dealers on the corner instead of going after those that's supplying the drug dealers. :D
     
    d08 likes this.
  3. Actually ...

    SEC are like cops going after the vigilantes that take out the drug dealers on the corner instead of going after the drug dealers

    ...There, fix'd it for you
     
  4. Pesky spoofers get in the way of perfectly valid front-running, I mean, market making
     
  5. d08

    d08

    At least they're doing something and not just surfing porn all day.
     
  6. sprstpd

    sprstpd

    Considering how every decision they have made in the past two decades seems to have hurt the retail trader, I'd rather they just watch porn.
     
    TraDaToR and NoVoodooHere like this.
  7. a-yup, job well done
     
  8. d08

    d08

    Every decision? Even prosecuting insiders and spoofers? We don't live in a black and white world.
     
    Occam likes this.
  9. sprstpd

    sprstpd

    I guess it depends on your outlook. If you think that jailing Martha Stewart was good for the retail trader or if you think spoofing is bad, then I guess you have a point. Personally, I think spoofing is fine - anything that leads to HFT losses is great in my book.
     
    NoVoodooHere likes this.
  10. Let them eat cake
     
    #10     Oct 16, 2015