Home > Community Lounge > Politics > Question for moderator Joe

Question for moderator Joe

  1. Apparently the alcoholic pedophile troll is complaining to the powers-that-be that its feelings are being hurt because certain ET members are daring to criticize it for its disgusting posts, including pedophilia.

    As a result, moderator Joe has threatened via PM to ban those who even respond to the pedophile troll!

    Joe, if you're going to ignore repeated requests to at least warn the troll to cease such posts, and have instead decided to allow the sick creature to post about the rape of children, shouldn't you at least allow those who disagree that child rape is okay to voice their opinions?

    Is that not reasonable?

    Or are you going to go on the record here and state that, here on ET, a pedophile-defending troll has greater rights than those who oppose its views?
  3. Joe the "fair," "objective" moderator:

  4. http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=158108

    Wow, complete and utter verification that the resident troll is being protected by Joe.

    One must wonder what favors have been exchanged to consumate this unholy alliance.
  5. I just realized that you have about a 1/2 dozen peodphilia threads going right now. Go get some help dude, you got a problem that Joe can't help you with.
  6. I just realized you're very dumb.
  7. Joe wrote on 04-01-09 04:12 PM:
    I thought it was clear, no Zzzz.

    You were banned today, if you mention Zzz again you will be banned for a longer period of time, next is a 48 hour ban.



    More displays of objectivity from the troll's bodyguard, oops, I mean "moderator."
  8. Those glass houses are really something, aren't they, hapless?
  9. Coming from you, this is classic!!

    I'm merely asking that the troll not be able to post anything about pedophilia. You, on the other hand, started a thread demanding the troll be banned and claimed its pedophilia posts were the main reason you had done so:


    You're such a self-righteous POS. But you knew that already...
  10. FYI Joe is not a moderator. He is an admin. I have been on forums where you actually PAY to post and people got banned there for nothing. So you are actually being treated with kid gloves considering the admin can kick you out for any reason he wishes.

    Realistically, proliferation of threads discussing pedophilia cannot be good for this site. I cannot say I saw threads that started it all so I cannot render my judgment on this subject.
  11. You have no concept of the meaning of the glass house reference, do you?
  12. If it is anything other than one should not criticize or slander another if they themselves are vulnerable to retaliation, i.e. a hypocrite, please feel free to explain.
  13. That's interesting. It explains why he keeps banning me, after which I have to get Baron to reinstate me. It happened again yesterday. My crime? Mentioning the name of another member in a post I made. No insults, no challenges, no pejoratives. I just mentioned the guy's name.
  14. Take a look




    Baron is also administrator but it says owner of et and since his user id is 2 he has primacy.
  15. Ah, then you do understand. However, your initial response to my reference suggested that you missed the point. The fact that it still fails to register tells me that you did not quite get my point in its entirety as it relates to you. Perhaps in time...
  16. Hey asshole, when I start proposing that it would be hilarious for a pedophile to get to your kids, or even worse, that you rape your own children, THEN you can start your moral relativist bullshit about glass houses.

    In the interim, fuck off.
  17. I am not familiar with the origin of your specific complaint. However, you have exhibited a sufficient degree of selective perception and trollism of your own that I am disinclined to take you at your word, such as it is. In any event, I just found it ironic that a troll would point fingers, which brought the glass house reference to mind in the first place. (Do you see how that works?)

    In the interim, well, you know what to do:
  18. "Not familiar" eh? Gee that's funny, because in the thread you posted in Feedback to ban the troll you and Nik had this exchange:

    You quoted Nik on the above and then wrote:

    Thunderpussy, you really have stepped in it this time. Not only are you a hack for the far left, but you've been revealed to be a liar as well. Of course, the two often go together...

    The irony that you called on the troll to be banned, yet are now railing against my highlighting its perversities WHICH YOU CLAIMED AS QUOTED ABOVE TO BE THE BASIS FOR YOUR CALL TO HAVE IT BANNED, probably escape your feeble intellect, as does your rank hypocrisy.

    Like I said before - fuck off.
  19. You continue to amaze me. Reread what I wrote to you earlier. I do not know the specific offending references YOU refer to as they relate to YOU. And I do not accept anything YOU write at face value for the simple reason that you are, generally speaking, full of shit. This has become amply clear to me. I do recall my complaint against Z, but if you read the very quote of mine which you included in your post, it was not in connection with a specific person, and it certainly had nothing to do with you.

    AGAIN, I just found it funny that YOU, a bona fide troll, would be pointing fingers at anyone else. THAT was my ONLY point when I raised the glass house reference. Period. Meanwhile, you continue with your elaborate argument which has nothing to do with my glass house reference as it relates to YOU. Evidently, basic comprehension presents quite a challenge for you.
  20. You're the one who is full of shit.

    Your pathetic attempt to wiggle out of being caught in a lie is noted and filed. That you don't believe what I have said about the resident troll is completely and utterly not important, as many here have been witness to it. No matter how you try to twist it, you stated that the resident troll's pedophilia was the root cause of you calling for him to be banned, yet you're excoriating me because I'm highlighting the same damn thing, but on a more personal level because he said things about my kids.

    As for my being a troll, that is incredibly humorous, especially coming from someone who bounces from thread to thread declaring your man-love for Obama at every turn while excoriating the "far right," which to you means anyone who wouldn't suck Barry's dick if he dropped trou in front of them as you would gladly do. Not only that, you're a CANADIAN posting on an AMERICAN website about AMERICAN politics and politicians!! Talk about a fucking troll, you loser...

    Finally, you post at a higher rate than I do.

    Profile For Thunderdog

    Date Registered: 08-07-02
    Total Posts: 8431 (3.47 posts per day)

    Profile For hapaboy

    Date Registered: 10-31-01
    Total Posts: 7170 (2.64 posts per day)

    Good grief, you have the depth of a puddle...
  21. If you really love your children then you should consider putting them up for adoption so that they would have a chance at a normal upbringing. They'll thank you later.
  22. ^^^Nice dodge, O Canadian-with-a-manlove-crush-on-Obama.

    Ya know, you have tons in common with the very resident troll you tried to have banned. Talk about glass houses...
  23. The important thing is that you're not a troll in your parallel universe.
  24. Such marvelous restraint. You average 0.83 fewer posts per day than I do. Please tell me how you do it.
  25. I'm not sure, but, I think being banned occasionally helps keep the daily average post count down.

    Don't know if you want to travel that road or not, but it seems to work for some people. :D
  26. LOL! I start a few threads aimed at highlighting the pedophile tendencies of the resident troll, and then a Canadian moonbat with a man-love crush on Obama decides that makes me a troll. Never mind that said moonbat makes as many partisan swipes on multiple threads as anyone on this board, or that its post count is higher than mine. Hypocrite, liar, obfuscater. Yep, sounds a lot like the resident troll. You two have a LOT in common, yessirree...

    You can't make this stuff up.
  27. Chuck! Nice to see you took time out from chugging cock in bus stops to make a post...
  28. As much as you trash zzzz/option there seems to be an underlying trend of sexual language in your posts.

    Pedophilia is something totally abhorrent, therefore it is only natural for a person to NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT IT

    Threads discussing pedophilia need to stop.
  29. Chucky and I go way back, don't we Chuck? He has said as much or worse to me in the past...

    I agree it needs to stop. That is why I have been highlighting the depravity of the resident troll who defends pedophilia, considers it humorous, and has proposed more than once that my children be victims of a pedophile.

    I have requested moderator/administrator Joe to enforce a ban on the resident troll from starting any threads relating to or commenting on pedophilia. Sorry if this upsets you, but until that occurs, I will continue to highlight the actions of said troll.
  30. In my opinion, much worse. Considering the emotional stability involved and all.
  31. Perhaps you should share your fine literary stylings here at ET with some of your family members. No doubt, they would brim with pride.
  32. As opposed to your kin, who disowned you years ago.

    You and Chucky need to meet up. He love you long time.
  33. Tdog, this back and forth between us has gone too far. If I could delete this I would. My beef in this issue is not with you.