As the Wall Street Journal noted in the last month of Bushâs term, the former president had the âworst track record for job creation since the government began keeping records.â And job creation under Bush was anemic long before the recession began. Bushâs supply-side economics âfostered the weakest jobs and income growth in more than six decades,â along with âsluggish business investment and weak gross domestic product growth,â the Center for American Progressâ Joshua Picker explained. âOn every major measurementâ of income and employment, âthe country lost ground during Bushâs two terms,â the National Journalâs Ron Brownstein observed, parsing Census data. http://www.alternet.org/newsandview...e_year_than_bush_created_in_eight/#paragraph2
Center for American Progressâ Joshua Picker explained. âOn every major measurementâ of income and employment, âthe country lost ground during Bushâs two terms,â ------------------- I wonder if that guy ever looked out the window, fer chrissakes, you could count cranes and know he is dead wrong. Just in sub prime mortgages alone generated mucho dollars and jobs, who the fk built the houses, delivered products.
Neither Obama or Bush created ONE private sector job. Not one. Those private sector jobs were created by businesses not gov't tit-suckers.
Ahhhh, the voice of intelligence and reason! The left wing nuts here desperately need to believe that Dumbo hasn't been a total failure.
Private sector jobs are created when the government relaxes taxes and regulations. With regard to Obama creating more jobs than Bush, that's total nonsense. The graph presented in the first post does not represent all of Bush's eight years, and is not an illustration of the title of this thread.
Obama has also spent more in one year than Bush spent in eight years. Obama has spent trillions of dollars on stimulus/job creations packages that have us where? 9.4% unemployment!!!!!! ROFLMAO!!