Next up - the credit default swap crisis

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by S2007S, Jun 11, 2008.

  1. S2007S


    Jun 12, 2008

    Page 1 of 2
    Next up - the credit default swap crisis
    By F William Engdahl

    While attention has been focussed on the relatively tiny US subprime home mortgage default crisis as the center of the current financial and credit crisis impacting the Anglo-Saxon banking world, a far larger problem is now coming into focus.

    Subprime, or high-risk collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), are only the tip of a colossal iceberg of dodgy credits that are beginning to go sour. The next crisis is already beginning in the US$62 trillion market for credit default swaps (CDS).

    The credit default swap was invented a few years ago by a young Cambridge University mathematics graduate, Blythe Masters, hired by JP Morgan Chase Bank in New York and who, fresh from university, convinced her new bosses to develop the revolutionary new risk product.

    A CDS is a credit derivative or agreement between two counterparties in which one makes periodic payments to the other and gets a promise of a payoff if a third party defaults. The first party gets credit protection, a kind of insurance, and is called the "buyer". The second party gives credit protection and is called the "seller". The third party, the one that might go bankrupt or default, is known as the "reference entity". CDSs became staggeringly popular as credit risks exploded during the past seven years in the United States. Banks argued that with CDS they could spread risk around the globe.

    Credit default swaps resemble an insurance policy as they can be used by debt owners to hedge, or insure against, a default on a debt. However, because there is no requirement to actually hold any asset or suffer a loss, credit default swaps can also be used for speculative purposes.

    Warren Buffett once described derivatives bought speculatively as "financial weapons of mass destruction". In his Berkshire Hathaway annual report to shareholders he said:

    Unless derivatives contracts are collateralized or guaranteed, their ultimate value depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparties. In the meantime, though, before a contract is settled, the counterparties record profits and losses - often huge in amount - in their current earnings statements without so much as a penny changing hands. The range of derivatives contracts is limited only by the imagination of man (or sometimes, so it seems, madmen).

    A typical CDO is for a five-year term. Like many exotic financial products that are extremely complex and profitable in times of easy credit, when markets reverse, as has been the case since August 2007, in addition to spreading risk, credit derivatives, in this case, also amplify risk considerably.

    Now the other shoe is about to drop in the $62 trillion CDS market due to rising junk bond defaults by US corporations as the recession deepens. That market has long been a disaster in the making. An estimated $1.2 trillion could be at risk of the nominal $62 trillion in CDOs outstanding, making it far larger than the subprime market.

    No regulation
    A chain reaction of failures in the CDS market could trigger the next global financial crisis. The market is entirely unregulated, and there are no public records showing whether sellers have the assets to pay out if a bond defaults. This so-called counterparty risk is a ticking time bomb. The US Federal Reserve under the former ultra-permissive chairman, Alan Greenspan, and the US government's financial regulators allowed the CDS market to develop entirely without supervision. Greenspan repeatedly testified to skeptical congressmen that banks are better risk regulators than government bureaucrats.

    The Fed bailout of Bear Stearns on March 17 this year was motivated, in part, by a desire to keep the unknown risks of that bank's credit default swaps from setting off a global chain reaction that might have brought the financial system down. The Fed's fear was that because it didn't adequately monitor counterparty risk in credit-default swaps, it had no idea what might happen. Thank Greenspan for that. Those counterparties include JPMorgan Chase, the largest seller and buyer of CDSs.

    The Fed does not have supervision to regulate the CDS exposure of investment banks or hedge funds, both of which are significant CDS issuers. Hedge funds, for instance, are estimated to have written 31% in CDS protection.

    The credit-default-swap market has been mainly untested until now. The default rate in January 2002, when the swap market was valued at $1.5 trillion, was 10.7%, according to Moody's Investors Service. But Fitch Ratings reported in July 2007 that 40% of CDS protection sold worldwide was on companies or securities that are rated below investment grade, up from 8% in 2002.

    A surge in corporate defaults will now leave swap buyers trying to collect hundreds of billions of dollars from their counterparties. This will serve to complicate the financial crisis, triggering numerous disputes and lawsuits, as buyers battle sellers over the technical definition of default - this requires proving which bond or loan holders weren't paid - and the amount of payments due. Some fear that could in turn freeze up the financial system.

    Experts inside the CDS market now believe that the crisis will likely start with hedge funds that will be unable to pay banks for contracts tied to at least $150 billion in defaults. Banks will try to pre-empt this default disaster by demanding hedge funds put up more collateral for potential losses. That will not work as many of the funds won't have the cash to meet the banks' demands for more collateral.

    Sellers of protection aren't required by law to set aside reserves in the CDS market. While banks ask protection sellers to put up some money when making the trade, there are no industry standards. It would be the equivalent of a licensed insurance company selling insurance protection against hurricane damage with no reserves against potential claims.

    Basle BIS worried
    The Basle Bank for International Settlements, the supervisory organization of the world's major central banks, is alarmed at the dangers. The Joint Forum of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, an international group of banking, insurance and securities regulators, wrote in April that the trillions of dollars in swaps traded by hedge funds pose a threat to financial markets around the world.

    "It is difficult to develop a clear picture of which institutions are the ultimate holders of some of the credit risk transferred," the report said. "It can be difficult even to quantify the amount of risk that has been transferred."

    Counterparty risk can become complicated in a hurry. In a typical CDS deal, a hedge fund will sell protection to a bank, which will then resell the same protection to another bank, and such dealing will continue, sometimes in a circle. That has created a huge concentration of risk. As one leading derivatives trader expressed the process:

    The risk keeps spinning around and around in this daisy chain like a vortex. There are only six to 10 dealers who sit in the middle of all this. I don't think the regulators have the information that they need to work that out.

    Traders, and even the banks that serve as dealers, don't always know exactly what is covered by a credit-default-swap contract. There are numerous types of CDSs, some far more complex than others. More than half of all CDSs cover indexes of companies and debt securities, such as asset-backed securities, the Basel committee says. The rest include coverage of a single company's debt or collateralized debt obligations.

    Banks usually send hedge funds, insurance companies and other institutional investors e-mails throughout the day with bid and offer prices, as there is no regulated exchange to price the market or to insure against loss. To find the price of a swap on Ford Motor Co debt, for example, even sophisticated investors might have to search through all of their daily e-mails.

    Banks want secrecy
    Banks have a vested interest in keeping the swaps market opaque, because as dealers, the banks have a high volume of transactions, giving them an edge over other buyers and sellers. Since customers don't necessarily know where the market is, you can charge them much wider profit margins.

    Banks try to balance the protection they've sold with credit-default swaps they purchase from others, either on the same companies or indexes. They can also create synthetic CDOs, which are packages of credit-default swaps the banks sell to investors to get themselves protection.

    The idea for the banks is to make a profit on each trade and avoid taking on the swap's risk. As one CDO dealer puts it, "Dealers are just like bookies. Bookies don't want to bet on games. Bookies just want to balance their books. That's why they're called bookies."

    Now as the economy contracts and bankruptcies spread across the United States and beyond, there's a high probability that many who bought swap protection will wind up in court trying to get their payouts. If things are collapsing left and right, people will use any trick they can.

    Last year, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange set up a federally regulated, exchange-based market to trade CDSs. So far, it hasn't worked. It's been boycotted by banks, which prefer to continue their trading privately.
  2. Thanks for this post. It's well written.