Wow, you may or may not be in favor of Ron Paul, but the NYT is really showing some unmistakable bias today.
Here's a summary of the primaries thus far, and Ron Paul is fully excluded from their summary. He took 2nd place in the state of Nevada, and is fully excluded from this NYT chart of the results.
As I said, you may or may not support this candidate, but do take notice of the objectivity of this New York Times reporting. This isn't a beauty pageant, this a market dominant US newspaper's coverage of primary election results in the State of Nevada.
The NYT excluding important facts?!? Wow, there's a first....