Home > Community Lounge > Chit Chat > LOAD UP SHORTS: Powell warns of Jan 21/22 (war?)

LOAD UP SHORTS: Powell warns of Jan 21/22 (war?)

  1. CRAZY CENSORSHIP: WHY DID ET REMOVED THIS THREAD?

    Colin Powell's a reliable source for informed leaks. He managed to inform us that Al Jazeera would release a Bin Laden tape proving Iraq's links with Al Qaeda... hours before Ah Jazeera claimed they "discovered" the tape.

    Now regarding the Financial Crisis, Powell's crystal ball tells us, “The problems will always be there and there’s going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don’t even know about right now."

    Huh? If we don't even know about it how does he know exactly WHEN the problem we don't know about is coming?

    Has this anything to do with the Debka File's claim Iran will have nuclear bomb capability by Feb '09?

    Democratic VP Joe Biden said, "There will be an “international crisis” early into Barack Obama’s presidency that will test the new president by forcing him to make unpopular decisions. "

    Huh? Who, what, why, where - don't just give us the when! And Obama will be President?

    Perhaps if we make generate enough publicity about this we can avert disaster - otherwise load up the shorts in Jan '09!

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/colin-p...-right-now.html

    Just like the Patriot Act was ready for 911, expect the global governance elite to have a pile of new laws ready for this crisis. Oh and don't worry, we are all safe in their hands... after all they know it's coming

    CRAZY CENSORSHIP: WHY DID ET REMOVED THIS THREAD?
     
  2. US intelligence: Iran will be able to build first nuclear bomb by February 2009
    DEBKAfile Exclusive Report

    October 21, 2008, 1:06 PM (GMT+02:00)

    US intelligence’s amended estimate, that Iran will be ready to build its first bomb just one month after the next US president is sworn in, is disclosed by DEBKAfile’s Washington sources as having been relayed as a guideline to the Middle East teams of both presidential candidates, Senators John McCain and Barack Obama.

    The information prompted the assertion by Democratic vice presidential nominee Joseph Biden in Seattle Sunday, Oct. 19: “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy.”

    McCain retorted Tuesday, Oct. 21: “America does not need a president that needs to be tested. I’ve been tested. I was aboard the Enterprise off the coast of Cuba. I’ve been there.”)

    DEBKAfile’s military sources cite the new US timeline: By late January, 2009, Iran will have accumulated enough low-grade enriched uranium (up to 5%) for its “break-out” to weapons grade (90%) material within a short time. For this, the Iranians have achieved the necessary technology. In February, they can move on to start building their first nuclear bomb.

    US intelligence believes Tehran has the personnel, plans and diagrams for a bomb and has been running experiments to this end for the past two years. The UN International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna last week asked Tehran to clarify recent complex experiments they conducted in detonating nuclear materials for a weapon, but received no answer.

    The same US evaluation adds that the Iranian leadership is holding off its go-ahead to start building the bomb until the last minute so as to ward off international pressure to stop at the red line.

    This development together with the galloping global economic crisis will force the incoming US president to go straight into decision-making without pause on Day One in the Oval Office. He will have to determine which urgent measures can serve best for keeping a nuclear bomb out of the Islamic republic’s hands - diplomatic or military – and how to proceed if those measures fail.

    His knowledge of the challenge colored Sen. Biden’s additional words in Seattle: “Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”

    Israel’s political and military leaders also face a tough dilemma that can no longer be put off of whether to strike Iran’s nuclear installations militarily in the next three months between US presidencies before the last window closes, or take a chance on coordination with the next president.

    Waiting for the “international community” to do the job of stopping Iran, as urged by governments headed by Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert - and strongly advocated Tzipi Livni, foreign minister and would-be prime minister - has been a washout. Iran stands defiantly on the threshold of a nuclear weapon.
     
  3. If you people need this condensed, I will be glad to:

    1. Islamic nations will collude with Russia and China to comprehensively nuke the USA. Why do you think I live an hour from the Canadian border, and know all the unofficial ways to get in there?

    Any questions?
     
  4. The Powers understand that it's easy to "slip something by" the public when they are stressed or in panic...

    :mad:
     
  5. Yes, and those in money and power know the masses better than they know themselves.
     
  6. You just threw any credibility you may have ever had, out the window.
     
  7. Debka has some great reading and exclusive stuff, but they must be considered as a foreign source. Not than CNN has more objectivity than Debka...
     
  8. Got ThyroSafe?
     
  9. I didn't remove it. I put it in chit chat where it belongs.
     
  10. What Will Obama’s “International Crisis” Be?

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Prison Planet
    Wednesday, October 22, 2008


    Joe Biden’s “guarantee” that an “international crisis” will unfold shortly after President Obama takes office conjures up several different possibilities, but it seems the likely outcome will revolve around an announcement that Iran has developed a nuclear bomb, prompting a potential military attack.

    “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy,” Biden told an audience in Seattle this past weekend.

    “Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”

    The assured tone with which Biden delivered his forecast was staggeringly convincing, and left the observer in no doubt that there will be a major world crisis shortly after Obama takes office. “Mark my words, mark my words,” Biden stressed, adding that “tough” and “unpopular” foreign policy decisions will have to be made.

    “I promise you it will occur,” Biden added, “As a student of history and having served with seven presidents, I guarantee you it is going to happen.”

    Biden’s use of the word “generated” is even more startling. One of the dictionary definitions we find for the word “generated” is “to bring into existence; cause to be; produce,” which begs the question, will this be another staged and manufactured crisis like the 9/11 attacks, which occurred less than 8 months after Bush took office?

    Or will it be something even more serious, a nuclear conflagration involving Russia or Iran?

    John McCain raised the specter of nuclear war yesterday when he warned that the United States faces “many challenges here at home, and many enemies abroad in this dangerous world,” before mentioning the 1962 Cuban Missile crisis.

    Echoing Biden’s comments, McCain said the next president “won’t have time to get used to the office” and “I know how close we came to a nuclear war and I will not be a president that needs to be tested. I have been tested. Senator Obama has not.”

    What is the test to which McCain and Biden refer, and how can they be so sure that it will arrive shortly after Obama takes office should he win the election as expected? What was Colin Powell referring to on Meet The Press when he said, “There’s going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don’t even know about right now.”

    The most likely scenario seems to revolve around Iran announcing, or the U.S. government claiming, that they are ready to build their first nuclear bomb.

    Indeed, the Mossad front news outlet Debka File reported yesterday that “Iran will be ready to build its first bomb just one month after the next US president is sworn in.” The very next sentence of the report ties this in with Biden’s promise of an international crisis immediately after Obama takes office.

    “DEBKAfile’s military sources cite the new US timeline: By late January, 2009, Iran will have accumulated enough low-grade enriched uranium (up to 5%) for its “break-out” to weapons grade (90%) material within a short time. For this, the Iranians have achieved the necessary technology. In February, they can move on to start building their first nuclear bomb,” according to the report.

    Of course, the legitimacy of these claims are likely to be completely fabricated - the official U.S. National Intelligence Estimate concluded in December that Iran had suspended its nuclear weapons campaign in late 2003 - but the Israelis may be laying the groundwork for a propaganda offensive similar to the “weapons of mass destruction” scam that preceded the invasion of Iraq.

    Will the military assault on Iran occur not under the highly unpopular Bush administration, as many had predicted, but under an Obama presidency? Riding into office on a wave of popular approval and support, Obama will have the political capital to get the country behind the attack if the threat of imminent danger is cited - or at least stand by and allow Israel to do the dirty work.

    Will a nuclear flash point on the scale of the Cuban Missile Crisis turn out to be the “international crisis” that Biden so vehemently promised? Or will the event take on a different characteristic.

    Bush exploited 9/11 to realize the pre-set agenda of his Neo-Con masters months after he was inaugurated and Bill Clinton seized upon the Oklahoma City Bombing shortly into his second term to expand federal power. What will Obama’s crisis be that enables him to offer his contribution to building the American police state?

    - A terror attack, or a series of attacks, on major American cities, possibly involving crudely designed nuclear bombs or dirty bombs?

    - A complete economic collapse and a new great depression leading to food riots and the imposition of martial law?

    - A military showdown with Russia should Russia attempt to invade Georgia or another pro-U.S. Russian satellite country?

    - A nuclear showdown with Russia should Russia start a nuclear war with Ukraine, as has been threatened?

    - The necessity for another military attack on Afghanistan should the Taliban continue to regain control of the country?

    - A confrontation with Venezuela should it be revealed that Hugo Chavez is receiving nuclear bomb technology from Russia or Iran?

    - A new escalation in the Middle East should Israel deploy its nuclear arsenal to attack Iran, Syria Lebanon, or even Egypt?

    Whatever the new “international crisis” that we have been guaranteed turns out to be, you can bet your bottom dollar that the response to it will ultimately lead to more carnage and a further assault on the fast-disappearing freedoms that we still enjoy - and in that sense under an Obama presidency, the more things “change,” the more they will stay the same.


    Videos here............ http://www.infowars.com/?p=5465