Kudos to MMs

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by nitro, Oct 23, 2008.

  1. did parameter inversion cause OFV change to warrant a short or did you use a separate rule: "if the parameter inverts go short regardless of OFV"?
     
    #3991     Nov 11, 2011
  2. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Shortie, the rules changes as losses accrue. Trading 101. He doesn't have anything yet. He is still searching.
     
    #3992     Nov 11, 2011
  3. nitro

    nitro

    SPX, 1265.41. FV, 1129.28. OFV, 1243.87.

    Notice that both OFV and FV are below SPX. Parameter is also inverted. We will see how this plays out. I have three units short, average price from 1236.66 ~(1220, 1245, 1245).
     
    #3993     Nov 11, 2011
  4. nitro

    nitro

    No I would not have gone short the other two units without a strong conviction that OFV was also going below SPX.
     
    #3994     Nov 11, 2011
  5. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Nitro, what happened to the shorts at 1140, 1176 and 1220?
     
    #3995     Nov 11, 2011
  6. Im convinced this clown is mocking you.

    By the laws of chance, no one can be this wrong so often.

    He is a actually a great trader.

    You have been had.

    I have retired all my winning systems to devote myself to fading the fool.

    I am already up 7 figures.

    [​IMG]

    why so many hits on this thread. the whole street comes here for their signals
     
    #3996     Nov 11, 2011
  7. [​IMG]
     
    #3997     Nov 11, 2011
  8. GTS

    GTS

    See previous post below:
     
    #3998     Nov 11, 2011
  9. noddyboy

    noddyboy

    In other words, realized losses occurred, and now unrealized losses.
     
    #3999     Nov 11, 2011
  10. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    So that leaves him short at 1176 and 1220 and some other price. There is no way his average price is what he states then.

    "I have three units short, average price from 1236.66 ~(1220, 1245, 1245)." Nitro

    When he did cover the 1176 short?
     
    #4000     Nov 11, 2011