Is Obama The Weakest President In History?

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by pspr, Mar 18, 2011.

  1. pspr

    pspr

    INEFFECTUAL, invisible, unable to honour pledges and now blamed for letting Gaddafi off the hook.

    What is President Obama doing about anything? The most alarming answer – your guess is as good as mine – is also, frankly, the most accurate one. What the President is not doing is being clear, resolute and pro-active, which is surely a big part of his job description. This is what he has to say about the popular uprising in Libya: “Gaddafi must go.” At least, that was his position on March 3.


    Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view...e-Weakest-President-in-history-#ixzz1GxXD3WPJ
     
  2. I don't see how anybody can call him weak or give him a noble prize when he is an aggressive war mongering president

    He has continued the Iraq campaign,Made the Afgan war bigger,sent the Navy to North Korean and Chinese shores to hold live fire war drills while threatening North Korea and disregarding Chinas calls for the US Navy not to come near their shores(How would we feel if Chinese aircraft carriers parked themselves off of California's coast and started holding live fire war drills ? ),he is about to start bombing the shit out of Libya,he bombs Pakistan on a regular basis ,every pirate that has attacked a US boat has been killed or captured ,Has made the department of Homeland security even more aggressive then it was under Bush,Kept Gitmo open etc


    Obama promised to be a man of peace,he is far from it and far from weak imo
     
  3. pspr

    pspr

    The only reason he has continued Afghanistan is because he campaigned on it as the righteous war. As the article states, he is indecisive, weak and ineffective.
     
  4. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    Weak, feckless, indecisive.

    Detached.

    Obama is in way over his head.
     
  5. benwm

    benwm

    LOL very funny
     
  6. The door kicking video is fake but these aren't:

    <object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3kyD_e0Y7FQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3kyD_e0Y7FQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

    <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9WlqW6UCeaY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9WlqW6UCeaY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
     
  7. I really wish that were true,If it was we would be out of Iraq, Out of Afghanistan,Our Navy would not be trying to provoke a war with North Korea and China,he would have said from the start we would not intervene in Libya and he could have vetoed the resolution as The US has veto power,we would not be spending over 600-900 billion a year on wars and defense
     
  8. pspr

    pspr

    Military operations are done in Iraq. We are trying to prevent a war with North Korea since they only understand shows of strength. He never said we wouldn't intervene in Libya but so far we haven't. We spend so much on defense because the world is a very bad place with many countries wishing the United States were wiped off the earth.

    Status quo on these things are NOT signs of a strong president. Leadership is and he has shown very little. Even Democrats are deriding him over his lack of leadership. The guy is weak with regard to both foreign policy and domestic policy.

    Obama bows to Chinese Premier.

    <img src=http://www.theblogmocracy.com/wp-content/uploads/Obama-Bows-to-China.jpg>
     
    #10     Mar 18, 2011