Is Autotrading the solution to our psychological trading pain?

Discussion in 'Psychology' started by autotradingalgos, Apr 7, 2016.

How many traders out of 100 do you think could follow a proven automated portfolio of systems?

  1. <20

    66.7%
  2. >20<40

    5.6%
  3. >40<60

    16.7%
  4. >60<80

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. >80

    11.1%
  1. You guys remember the film "Trading Places". Well I am old enough to remember it.
    Two old guys placing a bet that any man on the street can be changed by giving them opportunity? Well I have a similar bet going with a fellow coding quant that asks if you gave out a portfolio of profitable trading systems to 100 traders, how many would be able to follow it over time ? - He says with automation 60 % - I say less than 30 %.

    Sound a bit low? Well I can speak from personal experience, the need to interfere is very very strong. I consider myself a good math geek researcher/coder, but when it came to execution or adjusting whilst in a position I was the worst. That is why I automate trades - but that is not the whole picture.

    You need an edge = Yes
    You need multiple edges expressed in a portfolio of systems = For sure
    You need sound money management = Yes
    You need to code this up = helpful for personalities like mine
    You need to leave it alone = The last part of the puzzle

    I have been through drawdowns that were short but in my head were the greatest test of my resolve - and that is with a deep understanding of the math and stats behind my systems.

    How many traders do you think could follow proven systems? One day I will have the stats to show you.
     
    benwm likes this.
  2. Q3D

    Q3D

    It's a past-proven system based on chaotic and ever-changing data, past performance is never reliable enough to be a guarantee of future results in trading, contrary to what you are implying of your system.
     
  3. nanama

    nanama

    I agree.
     
  4. True there are no guarantees in life - I was referring to a theoretical portfolio of proven systems. The only thing we have is past performance and statistical edges - there is no other material to work with.
     
    d08 likes this.
  5. Easier said than done, in my opinion. o_O
    Trading... requires a certain kind of individual that has a combination of traits and skills to pull it off, successfully :confused:;) ...specially in the long run.
     
  6. qxr1011

    qxr1011

    unfortunately it is not a solution, but just an attempt to avoid dealing with the source of the psychological trading pain problem

    the source of the psychological pain in trading is in conscience (or sub-conscience) knowledge of the trader that his method does not work
     
  7. Yes. It's a great solution after you have gone through the following stages:

    Stages of a Trader

    Stage One: The Mystification Stage

    This is where the neophyte trader begins. He has little or no understanding of market structure. He has no concept of the interrelationship among markets, much less between markets and the economy. Price charts are a meaningless mish-mash of colored lines and squiggles that look more like a painting from the MOMA than anything that contains information. Anyone who can make even a guess about price direction based on this tangle must be using black magic, or voodoo.

    However, as one begins to observe, read, study, the mess may begin to resolve itself into something that may make sense. Sort of.

    Stage Two: The Hot Pot Stage

    You scan the markets every day. After a while (sometimes a good long while), you notice a particular phenomenon which pops up regularly and seems to “work” pretty well. You focus on this pattern. You begin to find more and more instances of it and all of them work! Your confidence in the pattern grows and you decide to take it the very next time it appears. You take it, and almost immediately your stop is hit, and you’re underwater for the total amount of your stop-loss.

    So you back off and study this pattern further. And the very next time it appears, it works. And again. And yet again. So you decide to try again. And you take the full hit on your stop loss.

    Practically everyone goes through this, but few understand that this is all part of the win-lose cycle. They do not yet understand that loss is an inevitable part of any system/strategy/method/what have you, that is, there is no such thing as a 100% win approach. When they gauge the success of a particular pattern or setup, they get caught up in the win cycle. They don’t wait for the “lose” cycle to see how long it lasts or what the win/lose pattern is. Instead, they keep touching the pot and getting burned, never understanding that it’s not the pot (pattern/setup) that’s the problem, but a failure on their part to understand that it’s the heat from the stove (the market) that they’re paying no attention to whatsoever. So instead of trying to understand the nature of thermal transfer (the market), they avoid the pot (the pattern), moving on to another pattern/setup without bothering to find out whether or not the stove is on.

    Stage Three: The Cynical Skepticism Stage

    You’ve studied so hard and put so much effort into your trading and this universal failure in the patterns only when you take them causes you to feel betrayed by the market, the books and materials and gurus you tried to learn from. Everybody claims their ideas lead to profitability, but every time you take a trade, it’s a loser, even though the setups all worked perfectly before you played them. And since one of the most painful experiences is to fail when success looks easy, this embarrassment is transformed into anger: anger at the gurus, anger at the vendors, anger at the writers, the seminars, the courses, the brokers, the market makers, the specialists, the “manipulators”. What’s the point in trying to analyze and improve your own trading when there are so many dark forces out to get you?

    This excuse-driven blame game is a dead-end viewpoint, and explains a lot of what you find on message boards. Those who can’t pull themselves out of it will quit.

    Stage Four: The Squiggle Trader Stage

    If you don’t quit, you’ll move into the “squiggle trader” phase. Since you failed with patterns and so on, you figure there’s some “secret weapon”, a “holy grail” that’s known to the select few, something that will help you filter out all those bad trades. Once you find this magical key, your profits will explode and you’ll achieve every dream you ever had.

    You begin an obsessive study of every method and every indicator that is new to you. You buy every book, attend every course, sign up for every newsletter and advisory service, register for every trading website and every chat room. You buy more elaborate software. You buy off-the-shelf systems. You spend whatever it takes to buy success.

    Unfortunately, you stack so much onto your charts that you become paralyzed. With so many inputs, you can’t make a decision, particularly since they rarely agree. So you focus on those which agree with the direction of the trade you’ve taken (or, if you’re the fearful sort, you look only for those which will prove to you how much of a loser you think you are).

    This is all characteristic of scared money. Without a genuine acceptance of the fact of loss and of the risks involved in trading, you flit around like a butterfly in search of anything or anybody who will tell you that you know what you’re doing. This serves two purposes: (1) it transfers to others the responsibility for the trade and (2) it shakes you out of trades as your indicators begin to conflict. The MACD says buy, the sto says sell. The ADX says the market is trending, the OBV says it’s overbought. By the end of the day, your brain is jelly.

    This process can be useful if the trader learns from it what is popular, i.e., what other traders are doing, and, if he lasts, how to trade traps and panic/euphoria. And even though he may decide that much of it is crap, he will, if he doesn’t slip back into the Cynical Skepticism Stage, have a more profound appreciation — achieved through personal experience — of what is sensible and logical and what is nonsense. He might also learn something more about the kind of trader he is, what “style” suits him best, learn to distinguish between what is desirable and what is practical.

    But the vast majority of traders never leave this stage. They spend their “careers” searching for the answer, and even though they may eventually achieve piddling profits (if they don’t, they will of course eventually no longer be trading), they never become truly successful, and this has its own insidious consequences.

    Stage Five: The Inwardly-Bound Stage

    The trader who is able to pry himself out of Stage Four uses his experiences there productively. The trader learns, as stated earlier, what styles, techniques, tactics are popular. But instead of focusing entirely on what’s “out there”, he begins to ask himself some questions:

    What exactly does he want? What is he trying to accomplish?

    What sort of trading makes the most sense to him? Long or intermediate-term trading? Short-term trading? Day-trading? Trend-trading? Scalping? Which is most comfortable?

    What instrument — futures, stocks, ETFs, bonds, options — provides the range and volatility he requires but is not outside his risk tolerance? Did he learn anything at all about indicators in Stage Four that he might be able to use?

    And so he “auditions” all of this in order to determine what suits him, taking all that he has learned so far and experimenting with it.

    He begins to incorporate the “scientific method” into his efforts in order to develop a trading plan, including risk management and trade management. He learns the value of curiosity, of detached interest, of persistence and perseverance, of taking bits and pieces from here and there in order to fashion a trading plan and strategy that are uniquely his, one in which he has complete confidence because he has tested it thoroughly and knows from his own experience that it is consistently profitable.

    He accepts fully the responsibility for his trades, including the losses, which is to say that he understands that losses are inevitable and unavoidable. Rather than be thrown by them, he accepts them for what they are, a part of the natural course of business. He examines them, of course, in order to determine whether or not some error was made, particularly one that can be corrected, though true trading errors are rare. But, if not, he simply shrugs off the loss and goes on about his business. He understands, after all, that he is in control of his risk in the market.

    He doesn’t rant about his broker or the specialist or the market maker or that vast conspiracy of everyone who’s trying to cheat him out of his money. He doesn’t attempt revenge against the market. He doesn’t fret. He doesn’t fume. He doesn’t succumb to hope, fear, greed, and impulsiveness. Emotional trades are gone. Instead, he just trades.

    Stage Six: Mastery

    At this level, the trader achieves an almost Zen-like trading state. Planning, analysis, research are the focus of his time and his effort. When the trading day opens, he’s ready for it. He’s calm, relaxed, and centered.

    Trading becomes effortless. He is thoroughly familiar with his plan. He knows exactly what he will do in any given situation, even if the doing means exiting immediately upon a completely unexpected development. He understands the inevitability of loss and accepts it as a natural part of the business of trading. No one can hurt him because he’s protected by his rules and his discipline.

    He is sensitive to and in tune with the ebb and flow of market behavior and the natural actions and reactions to it that his research has taught him will optimize his edge. He is “available”. He doesn’t have to know what the market will do next because he knows how he will react to anything the market does and is confident in his ability to react correctly.

    He understands and practices “active inaction”, knowing exactly what it is he wants, exactly what it is he’s looking for, and waiting, patiently, for exactly the right opportunity. If and when that opportunity presents itself, he acts decisively and without hesitation, then waits, patiently, again, for the next opportunity.

    He does not convince himself that he is right. He watches price movement and draws his conclusions. When market behavior changes, so do his tactics. He acknowledges that market movement is the ultimate truth. He doesn’t try to outsmart or outguess it.

    He is, in a sense, outside himself, acting as his own coach, asking himself questions and explaining to himself without rationalization what he’s waiting for, what he’s doing, reminding himself of this or that, keeping himself centered and focused, taking distractions in stride. He doesn’t get overexcited about winning trades; he doesn’t get depressed about losing trades. He accepts that price does what it does and the market is what it is. His performance has nothing to do with his self-worth.

    It is during this stage that the “intuitive” sense begins to manifest itself. As infrequent as it may be, he learns to experiment with it and to build trust in it.

    And at the end of the day, he reviews his work, makes whatever adjustments are necessary, if any, and begins his preparation for the following day, satisfied with himself for having traded well.

    The knowledge proved through research that a particular price pattern or market behavior offers an acceptable level of predictability and risk to reward to provide a consistently profitable outcome over time.


    NO SHORTCUTS. PERIOD
     
    SMA, d08, benwm and 5 others like this.
  8. Handle123

    Handle123

    10%. But that doesn't mean the 90% could handle having automation either.
     
    wrbtrader likes this.
  9. The 90% will have less stress as their losses are automated.
     
    profitlocker and Handle123 like this.
  10. Joking aside, this is probably true :)

    Less stressful to lose $300 at a time instead of an over-leveraged $3000 hit. Might learn something along the way. Either way the losses should hurt
     
    #10     Apr 7, 2016