If there is a consensus on global warming then it logically follows that we can not expect to improve our understanding on the subject through research, and thus ALL FUTURE FUNDING FOR CLIMATE RESEARCH SHOULD BE ELIMINATED. How do you apply for a government grant to study something that there is already a consensus on? These clowns have argued for years that this is settled, while dipping their hands in the cookie jar for more money.
Yes, just like we know that biology is true so why spend more money on basic research. Or we know weather happens so why bother trying to improve the prediction models? Let's just use the Farmer's Almanac. In fact why bother doing any science research at all? We already know some stuff. Climate science is important. Having some idea of what we can expect is important for planning. How far and quickly will the sea rise? Where might droughts start occuring? Stuff like that. But it's telling that you would refer to scientists as clowns. Morons tend to do that.
First of all, biology is a field of science and they study various processes concerned with living organisms. They use the scientific method to either support or refute a hypothesis or theory. They use evidence to support their views. They do not decree things to be true then say 'Don't worry about all of our blown predictions, there is a consensus'. They ought to work on improving their models? Ya think? When you consider that every single one of their models is WRONG, I guess they should have been doing that all along. The question becomes, if there is a consensus, why would the consensus model be wrong, if the consensus is actually correct. It seems a lot more logical that the consensus model is wrong, because the consensus is wrong. Don't worry though, there used to be a consensus that the Earth was flat, and the Earth was the center of the Universe. I really hit a raw nerve on this one, because we all know what global warming is all about. It's got nothing to do with making the world a better place, it has everything to do with money and power of the elite. The global warming profiteers like Al Gore will never rest and they will do whatever it takes to consolidate as much money and power for themselves. Of course for every scoundrel getting rich on a lie, an army of useful idiots is required. So FC are you a scoundrel or a useful idiot? On one final note, its March 17th and its fucking snowing out, so how does that fit into your model, Michael Mann.
Yes CO2 is a greenhouse gas and the earth's ice is melting because it's all about power and money and virtually the entire world's science community is in on it. Plus everyone knows if it's snowing in your backyard the world must not be warming. Good thinking. Not. You wear an upside down name tag don't you?
Yadda, Yadda, Yadda... Green house gas .. earth's ice .... world's science community.... Yadda Yadda Yadda... The same unthinking crud repeated over and over. FC never provides proper responses based on facts, he just recycles the same old bullshiat like a retarded parrot. Of course he always has to insult others because he can not formulate any type of reasonable response. On and on he rants...
When's LEAPup going to out him, also? If only I had an IP address, or, even better, an email address....
Science blogger and biological anthropologist Greg Laden once said that taking away the future from generations by promoting climate denial was a "criminal act." He doubled down on that March 16, saying that was only "wishful thinking" at the moment and defending a professor who said denialists ought to be charged with "criminal negligence."... http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/julia...-charging-climate-deniers-criminal-negligence