How You Can Get Big Gains That Wall Street Can’t A dirty secret of the investment business is that fund managers don’t buy and hold. Not because they don’t want to, but because they can’t. Illustration: Alex Nabaum By Jason Zweig Dec. 13, 2019 11:00 am ET The best-performing stock of the past 30 years isn’t Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Microsoft Corp. or Apple Inc. It’s little-known Jack Henry & Associates Inc., which provides technology to banks and other financial firms from its headquarters in Monett, Mo. (population 8,873). Jack Henry’s story is common among the “superstocks” with the highest long-run returns. Once-tiny companies, often neglected by professional investors for years, end up earning higher returns than stocks that were far bigger and better-known. Surprisingly, small investors may have a big edge over Wall Street’s giants in capturing these gains. That’s because, to earn such superior long-term results, you have to withstand bone-cracking short-term downdrafts along the way—something most fund managers can’t do. Share-price and index performance sinceDec. 31, 1985Source: FactSet%Jack Henry & AssociatesS&P 50019902000’10010,00020,00030,00040,00050,000 S&P 500xJun 30, 1988x29.4% That insight emerges from an analysis by Wilshire Associates for David Salem, co-chairman of New Providence Asset Management L.P., an investment firm in New York. If you’d invested $1,000 in Jack Henry stock at the closing price on Sept. 30, 1989, you’d have had $2,763,000 as of this Sept. 30, according to the Wilshire data. The same $1,000 invested in Berkshire Hathaway would have grown to $36,000; in the S&P 500, $16,000. Those figures include reinvested dividends. Earning that spectacular gain, however, would have taken almost superhuman determination: From June 2001 through October 2002, Jack Henry’s shares fell 67%. Between October 1996 and August 1999, the stock underperformed the S&P 500 by a cumulative 72 percentage points. The numbers are consistent: Among the top 10 stocks over the past three decades, four— Fair Isaac Corp. , Kansas City Southern, Best Buy Co. and Monster Beverage Corp. —suffered interim declines of at least 75%, according to Wilshire. To end up earning hundreds of times your original investment, you would have had to lose at least three-quarters of your money along the way. Monster’s stock dropped 92% from March 1990 through December 1995; the shares cumulatively underperformed the S&P 500 by 534 percentage points between late 1990 and early 2000, according to Wilshire. Yet $1,000 invested in Monster’s stock three decades ago grew to $506,000 by this past Sept. 30. Short-Term Pain, Long-Term Gain Jack Henry & Associates has earned the highest return of any stock in the Wilshire 5000 index over the past 30 years. Like other long-run winners, it has suffered severe underperformance along the way. Returns and underperformance relative to S&P 500, 30 years ended 3Q 2019 Excess Returns relative to S&P 500 Cumulative gain of a dollar invested 0 5 10 15 20 25 pct. pts. 0 $3,000 Microsoft Jack Henry & Associates Jack Henry & Associates –100 1,000 Kansas City Southern Maximum Underperformance relative to S&P 500 100 Best Buy –200 Fair Isaac UnitedHealth Group Cerner –300 Balchem –400 Mesa Labs –500 Monster Beverage –600 pct. pts. Note: Among stocks with the highest cumulative gain in the Wilshire 5000. Excess returns are average annual returns. Maximum underperformance is cumulative. All returns include reinvested dividends. Source: New Providence Asset Management Surely only a professional investor can withstand that kind of pain? Au contraire, says Mr. Salem: “It’s potentially career-ending for a manager to hold such big interim losers. I wonder if any manager has ever been able to stay the entire course with stocks like these.” A dirty secret of the investment business is that fund managers don’t buy and hold—not because they don’t want to, but because they can’t. That isn’t just because clients would fire them for holding on to losers. The more successful a little company is, the faster it becomes midsize and then large. Consider Amazon.com Inc. It went public in 1997 with a market value of about $300 million, qualifying it as a small company. Less than three years later, the stock had a market value of nearly $13 billion. SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS Do you think you have the fortitude to hold on to a stock that drops 75% or more? Join the conversation below. Small-company mutual funds that owned Amazon when it was tiny had to sell it once its market value grew into the billions. Otherwise it would have dominated their portfolios. Investors in those funds missed out on nearly all of Amazon’s stratospheric growth. Small stocks earn their highest returns not when they are small but rather as they migrate to large, according to research by finance professors Eugene Fama and Kenneth French. That description fits Jack Henry to a T. Founded in 1976, the company first sold shares to the public in November 1985. As of 1996, insiders still owned 41% of the stock; not until 2006 did any institutional investor show up owning 5% or more of the shares. Only in November 2018 did Jack Henry finally grow large enough to join the S&P 500 index, where it currently ranks 402nd by size. The stock is no longer cheap—it trades at a steep 41 times the past 12 months’ earnings and eight times book value, according to FactSet—but Jack Henry doesn’t ride many market fads. “Most of our growth has been truly organic,” coming from business expansion rather than acquisitions, says finance chief Kevin Williams. Unlike a lot of larger companies, Jack Henry hasn’t borrowed money to finance massive buybacks of its own stock; it has no long-term debt. On the back of the company’s business cards is the founders’ original motto: “Do the Right Thing, Do Whatever It Takes, Have Fun.” https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-you-can-get-big-gains-that-wall-street-cant-11576252808