The Other Plot to Wreck America How Wall Street gamed and inflated the housing bubble, made out like bandits, and then left millions of households in ruin. By FRANK RICH Published: January 9, 2010 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/opinion/10rich.html THERE may not be a person in America without a strong opinion about what coulda, shoulda been done to prevent the underwear bomber from boarding that Christmas flight to Detroit. In the years since 9/11, weâve all become counterterrorists. But in the 16 months since that other calamity in downtown New York â the crash precipitated by the 9/15 failure of Lehman Brothers â most of us are still ignorant about what Warren Buffett called the âfinancial weapons of mass destructionâ that wrecked our economy. Fluent as we are in Al Qaeda and body scanners, when it comes to synthetic C.D.O.âs and credit-default swaps, not so much. What we donât know will hurt us, and quite possibly on a more devastating scale than any Qaeda attack. Americans must be told the full story of how Wall Street gamed and inflated the housing bubble, made out like bandits, and then left millions of households in ruin. Without that reckoning, there will be no public clamor for serious reform of a financial system that was as cunningly breached as airline security at the Amsterdam airport. And without reform, another massive attack on our economic security is guaranteed. Now that it can count on government bailouts, Wall Street has more incentive than ever to pump up its risks â secure that it can keep the bonanzas while we get stuck with the losses. The window for change is rapidly closing. Health care, Afghanistan and the terrorism panic may have exhausted Washingtonâs already limited capacity for heavy lifting, especially in an election year. The White Houseâs chief economic hand, Lawrence Summers, has repeatedly announced that âeverybody agrees that the recession is overâ â which is technically true from an economistâs perspective and certainly true on Wall Street, where bailed-out banks are reporting record profits and bonuses. The contrary voices of Americans who have lost pay, jobs, homes and savings are either patronized or drowned out entirely by a political system where the banking lobby rules in both parties and the revolving door between finance and government never stops spinning. Itâs against this backdrop that this weekâs long-awaited initial public hearings of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission are so critical. This is the bipartisan panel that Congress mandated last spring to investigate the still murky story of what happened in the meltdown. Phil Angelides, the former California treasurer who is the inquiryâs chairman, told me in interviews late last year that he has been busy deploying a tough investigative staff and will not allow the proceedings to devolve into a typical blue-ribbon Beltway exercise in toothless bloviation. He wants to examine the financial sectorâs âgreed, stupidity, hubris and outright corruptionâ â from traders on the ground to the board room. âItâs important that we deliver new information,â he said. âWe canât just rehash what weâve known to date.â He understands that if he fails to make news or to tell the story in a way that is comprehensible and compelling enough to arouse Americans to demand action, Wall Street and Washington will both keep moving on, unchallenged and unchastened. Angelides gets it. But he has a tough act to follow: Ferdinand Pecora, the legendary prosecutor who served as chief counsel to the Senate committee that investigated the 1929 crash as F.D.R. took office. Pecora was a master of detail and drama. He riveted America even without the aid of television. His investigation led to indictments, jail sentences and, ultimately, key New Deal reforms â the creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Glass-Steagall Act, designed to prevent the formation of banks too big to fail. As it happened, a major Pecora target was the chief executive of National City Bank, the institution that would grow up to be Citigroup. Among other transgressions, National City had repackaged bad Latin American debt as new securities that it then sold to easily suckered investors during the frenzied 1920s boom. Once disaster struck, the bankâs executives helped themselves to millions of dollars in interest-free loans. Yet their own employees had to keep ponying up salary deductions for decimated National City stock purchased at a heady precrash price. Trade bad Latin American debt for bad mortgage debt, and you have a partial portrait of Citigroup at the height of the housing bubble. The reckless Citi executives of our day may not have given themselves interest-free loans, but they often walked away with the short-term, illusionary profits while their employees were left with shredded jobs and 401(k)âs. Among those Citi executives was Robert Rubin, who, as the Clinton Treasury secretary, helped repeal the last vestiges of Glass-Steagall after years of Wall Street assault. Somewhere Pecora is turning in his grave Rubin has never apologized, let alone been held accountable. But heâs hardly alone. Even after all the country has gone through, the titans who fueled the bubble are heedless. In last Sundayâs Times, Sandy Weill, the former chief executive who built Citigroup (and recruited Rubin to its ranks), gave a remarkable interview to Katrina Brooker blaming his own hand-picked successor, Charles Prince, for his bankâs implosion. Weill said he preferred to be remembered for his philanthropy. Good luck with that. Among his causes is Carnegie Hall, where he is chairman of the board. To see how far American capitalism has fallen, contrast Weill with the giant who built Carnegie Hall. Not only is Andrew Carnegie remembered for far more epic and generous philanthropy than Weillâs â some 1,600 public libraries, just for starters â but also for creating a steel empire that actually helped build Americaâs industrial infrastructure in the late 19th century. At Citi, Weill built little more than a bloated gambling casino. As Paul Volcker, the regrettably powerless chairman of Obamaâs Economic Recovery Advisory Board, said recently, there is not âone shred of neutral evidenceâ that any financial innovation of the past 20 years has led to economic growth. Citi, that âinnovativeâ banking supermarket, destroyed far more wealth than Weill can or will ever give away. Even now â despite its near-death experience, despite the departures of Weill, Prince and Rubin â Citi remains as imperious as it was before 9/15. Its current chairman, Richard Parsons, was one of three executives (along with Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs and John Mack of Morgan Stanley) who failed to show up at the mid-December White House meeting where President Obama implored bankers to increase lending. (The trio blamed fog for forcing them to participate by speakerphone, but the weather hadnât grounded their peers or Amtrak.) Last week, ABC World News was also stiffed by Citi, which refused to answer questions about its latest round of outrageous credit card rate increases and instead e-mailed a statement blaming its customers for ânot paying back their loans.â This from a bank that still owes taxpayers $25 billion of its $45 billion handout! If Citi, among the most egregious of Wall Street reprobates, feels it can get away with business as usual, itâs because it fears no retribution. And it got more good news last week. Now that Chris Dodd is vacating the Senate, his chairmanship of the Banking Committee may fall next year to Tim Johnson of South Dakota, home to Citiâs credit card operation. Johnson was the only Senate Democrat to vote against Congressâs recent bill policing credit card abuses. Though bad history shows every sign of repeating itself on Wall Street, it will take a near-miracle for Angelides to repeat Pecoraâs triumph. Our zoo of financial skullduggery is far more complex, with many more moving pieces, than that of the 1920s. The new inquiry does have subpoena power, but its entire budget, a mere $8 million, doesnât even match the lobbying expenditures for just three banks (Citi, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America) in the first nine months of 2009. The firms under scrutiny can pay for as many lawyers as they need to stall between now and Dec. 15, deadline day for the commissionâs report. More daunting still is the inquiryâs duty to reach into high places in the public sector as well as the private. The mystery of exactly what happened as TARP fell into place in the fateful fall of 2008 thickens by the day â especially the behind-closed-door machinations surrounding the government rescue of A.I.G. and its counterparties. Last week, a Republican congressman, Darrell Issa of California, released e-mail showing that officials at the New York Fed, then led by Timothy Geithner, pressured A.I.G. to delay disclosing to the S.E.C. and the public the details on the billions of bailout dollars it was funneling to its trading partners. In this backdoor rescue, taxpayers unknowingly awarded banks like Goldman 100 cents on the dollar for their bets on mortgage-backed securities. Why was our money used to make these high-flying gamblers whole while ordinary Americans received no such beneficence? Nothing less than complete transparency will connect the dots. Among the big-name witnesses that the Angelides commission has called for next week is Goldmanâs Blankfein. Geithner, Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke should be next. If they all skate away yet again by deflecting blame or mouthing pro forma mea culpas, it will be a sign that this inquiry, like so many other promises of reform since 9/15, is likely to leave Wall Streetâs status quo largely intact. Thatâs the ticking-bomb scenario that truly imperils us all.