Harvard Academic: “Abolish the White Race”

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by Soliloquy, Nov 27, 2008.

  1. Soliloquy

    Soliloquy

    <a title="alternate link" href="http://www.wntube.net/play.php?vid=703" target=blank>Abolition Of the White Race</a></i></strong> </em><em> &#8212; In this 9 1/2 minute video Scott Roberts exposes Harvard academic, Dr. Noah Ignatiev, a Jewish supremacist who seeks the destruction of the White race. His call for the genocide of Whites is a thinly veiled demand for the annihilation of a basic human right–that of cultural identity–by minimizing his target with his euphemism, “concept of whiteness”. Ignatiev uses his position as a Harvard academic to “educate” students about White people as a whole using violent images and words such as “genocide”, “destroy”, “abolish”, and “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity”.</em></p>
    <p><em>According to social conflict theories and human rights documents throughout the world, </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&amp;field-keywords=social+identity&amp;x=0&amp;y=0"><em>social identity</em></a><em> is a basic human need and right, a need that is as precious as food, water, and security. Social identity is a non-negotiable need. Dr, Ignatiev calls for the collective deprivation of this basic human need through his use of demonizing propaganda (</em><a href="http://racetraitor.org/"><em>his website, “Race Traitor”</em></a><em>) and the dehumanizing ideologies that he teaches at </em><a href="http://www.harvard.edu/siteguide/faqs/faq112.html"><em>Harvard University</em></a><em> with regards to the White race. It is important to note that </em><a href="http://www.enotes.com/genocide-encyclopedia/ethnocide"><em>cultural genocide is still <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">genocide</span> (defined)</em></a><em>.</em></p>

    <p><em>Dr. Ignatiev seeks to maximize the interests of non-Whites, not by encouraging a spirit of American independence, i.e. the development of personal responsibility and ownership of one’s choices, but rather at the expense, victimization, and annihilation of White people, White identity, and Westernization. For more understanding of identity as a basic human right, please research the internet for “social identity”, “basic human needs”, and “social conflict”.</p>
    <p>Following the video is an article by Paul Craig Roberts and its introduction at The Occidental Observer which explores Dr. Ignatiev’s direct call for the genocide of White people. &#8212; VG</em></p><p>&nbsp;</p><table width="272" align=left>
    <td><img title=ignatiev alt="" src="http://www.davidduke.com/images/ignatiev.jpg"/><br /><font face="Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif" size=2>Noah Ignatiev, Harvard University</font></td>
    <td></td>
    </table><p><span style="font-size: 27px; line-height: normal"><strong>Promoting genocide for whites? Noel Ignatiev and the culture of Western suicide</strong></span></p>
    <p><strong>The Occidental Observer</strong></p><p>There has been a renewed interest recently in a 2002 article by Paul Craig Roberts, actually the first of two (here is the second), drawing attention to a rather frightening phenomenon at Harvard University: the effort by a professor, Noel Ignatiev, and his journal, Race Traitor, to promote the “cultural and psychological genocide of whites.” </p><p>Now that’s an odd choice of words—guaranteed to draw attention to himself and his ideas. Was he in any way also promoting the slaughter/liquidation of whites, as some of his adversaries have suggested? Ignatiev says no. In his words, </p>
    <blockquote><p>We frequently get letters accusing us of being &#8220;racists,&#8221; just like the KKK, and have even been called a &#8220;hate group.&#8221; &#8230; </p><p>Our standard response is to draw an analogy with anti-royalism: to oppose monarchy does not mean killing the king; it means getting rid of crowns, thrones, royal titles, etc&#8230;.</p></blockquote><p>Ignatiev et al. have developed a story that goes as follows: A bunch of very bad people got together and created a category called “white” to which they belong but people with different colored skin can’t belong. Then they made laws that favored people in the white category, they colluded with other whites to dominate the economic and political process, and they invented baseless scientific theories in which whiteness had its roots in real biological differences. </p><p>All Ignatiev’s written material that we’ve seen carries the same odd message with the same extreme wording. He talks about the supposed privileges white people have just because they are in the white category, even though we all know that the only racial privileges in the US are affirmative action laws and various subterfuges that favor non-whites at the expense of whites. These practices result in blacks being overrepresented in high status jobs compared to their actual IQ and test scores. And it even results in people like Ward Churchill exaggerating their non-whiteness in order to become beneficiaries of this largesse. </p><p><font size=1>&nbsp;</font><br />
    <strong>Continue at <a title="numbersusa.com" target="blank" href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.com/articles/Editorial-Ignatiev.html">TheOccidentalObserver.com</a></strong>
    <div align="right"><font size="1" color="#82caff" face="Arial"><em>Staff</em></font></div>
    <br/>