It's irrelevant the reason why someone kills a bunch of cells. As long as the "abortion" occurs before the foetus has any characteristics of independent life, then any reason whatsoever is acceptable, since the cells are just part of the woman's body. Once the foetus develops enough to be a life form of its own, then the whole issue changes. But we are not discussing late term abortions, we are talking about early abortions where there is no "life" to be killed or saved.
So were desdemona, delilah, helen, sirens, and succubi. There was poster who said that women are a wasting asset. In other words, ur buying a top. She can only get older, saggier, fatter, and bitchier. Now, a man has no control over even if he wants a son or a daughter. His wife will determine that based on what she wants. None of these measures help to build a family, as any truly thinking man will objectively look at these prospects and determine that the risk/reward ratio is very severly skewed. The wealthier the man is, the more skewed it becomes.
Please tell us all when that instant in time is that your "bunch of cells" become an individual life form. Unless you can define that point, your post is irrelevant.
You will be hard pressed to distinguish an embryo of a horse from a human at early stages. Is it DNA that makes a human embryo so special? I don't have a problem with abortion unless it is really late or partial birth abortion that is not done to save the life of the woman.
This is good. There are way too many people in the world anyway. Too many people and not enough jobs. Unwanted kids rarely grow up to be valuable members of society. Pick your poison: war or abortion.
This is a good point, and believe me I think it will put a definite chill on family creation. What is unfortunate is that it will curb procreation in the places where it is needed most. Europa.