Press Release Citadel Securities Paying $22 Million for Misleading Clients About Pricing Trades FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2017-11 Washington D.C., Jan. 13, 2017 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Citadel Securities LLC has agreed to pay $22.6 million to settle charges that its business unit handling retail customer orders from other brokerage firms made misleading statements to them about the way it priced trades. The SEC’s order finds that Citadel Execution Services suggested to its broker-dealer clients that upon receiving retail orders they forwarded from their own customers, it either took the other side of the trade and provided the best price that it observed on various market data feeds or sought to obtain that price in the marketplace. The process of taking the other side of the trade of the retail orders is known as “internalization.” But the SEC’s order finds that two algorithms used by Citadel Securities did not internalize retail orders at the best price observed nor sought to obtain the best price in the marketplace. These algorithms were triggered when they identified differences in the best prices on market feeds, comparing the SIP feeds to the direct feeds from exchanges. One strategy, known as FastFill, immediately internalized an order at a price that was not the best price for the order that Citadel Securities observed. The other strategy, known as SmartProvide, routed an order to the market that was not priced to obtain immediately the best price that Citadel Securities observed. "Citadel Securities made misleading statements suggesting that it would provide or try to get the best prices it saw for retail orders routed by other broker-dealers," said Stephanie Avakian, Acting Director of the SEC Enforcement Division. "Internalizers can't suggest they are doing one thing yet do another when it comes to pricing trades." As a “wholesale market maker” or “internalizer” that specializes in handling retail orders from investors who are customers of other broker-dealers, Citadel Securities executes approximately 35 percent of the average daily volume of retail equity shares traded in the U.S. markets, according to the SEC’s order. “These two algorithms represented a small part of Citadel Securities’ internalization business, but they nevertheless affected millions of orders placed by retail investors because of Citadel Securities’ large role in that market,” said Robert Cohen, Co-Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit. “We are focused on the execution of retail orders and encourage investors to ask brokers, and brokers to ask internalizers, how they are determining best prices for retail orders.” The SEC’s order finds that Citadel Securities, which has since discontinued the two algorithms at issue, violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act from late 2007 through January 2010. Without admitting or denying the findings, Citadel Securities agreed to be censured and pay $5.2 million in disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus interest of more than $1.4 million and a penalty of $16 million. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Wm. Max Hathaway, Fuad Rana, David Bennett, Ainsley Kerr, and Carolyn Welshhans of the Market Abuse Unit, and Stephan Schlegelmilch from the Trial Unit. Maxwell Clarke and Michael Barnes of the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis provided substantial assistance. The investigation was supervised by Mr. Cohen.
Lots of other companies from different sectors are run by greedy people, but there I rarely hear about scandals there...
This highlights a general problem with the "wholesaler" model -- and any model that creates a conflict of interest between a client and their broker (who's receiving a kickback in the case of the wholesaler model). http://www.nanex.net/aqck2/3517.html According to the above study, something like $1 billion per year of slippage is imposed on the rest of us due to the wholesaling model, which is the major cause of "subpennying" in listed US stocks.