Charles Koch to Friedrich Hayek: Use Social Security! Thereâs right-wing hypocrisy, and then thereâs this: Charles Koch, billionaire patron of free-market libertarianism, privately championed the benefits of Social Security to Friedrich Hayek, the leading laissez-faire economist of the twentieth century. Koch even sent Hayek a government pamphlet to help him take advantage of Americaâs federal retirement insurance and healthcare programs. This extraordinary correspondence regarding Social Security began in early June 1973, weeks after Koch was appointed president of the Institute for Humane Studies. Along with his brothers, Koch inherited his fatherâs privately held oil company in 1967, becoming one of the richest men in America. He used this fortune to help turn the IHS, then based in Menlo Park, California, into one of the worldâs foremost libertarian think tanks. Soon after taking over as president, Koch invited Hayek to serve as the instituteâs âdistinguished senior scholarâ in preparation for its first conference on Austrian economics, to be held in June 1974. Hayek initially declined Kochâs offer. In a letter to IHS secretary Kenneth Templeton Jr., dated June 16, 1973, Hayek explains that he underwent gall bladder surgery in Austria earlier that year, which only heightened his fear of âthe problems (and costs) of falling ill away from home.â (Thanks to waves of progressive reforms, postwar Austria had near universal healthcare and robust social insurance plans that Hayek would have been eligible for.) IHS vice president George Pearson (who later became a top Koch Industries executive) responded three weeks later, conceding that it was all but impossible to arrange affordable private medical insurance for Hayek in the United States. However, thanks to research by Yale Brozen, a libertarian economist at the University of Chicago, Pearson happily reported that âsocial security was passed at the University of Chicago while you [Hayek] were there in 1951. You had an option of being in the program. If you so elected at that time, you may be entitled to coverage now.â ......... ----------- What?!?! He couldn't afford the free market healthcare in the US in the 70's??? Maybe he didn't bankrupt himself with hospital bills and end up on the road to serfdom. I wonder what he would say about that great free market healthcare in the US compared to those damn socialist countries in Europe. Last line very telling: Another question hangs over all this: Why didnât Charles Koch offer to put up some of his enormous wealth to pay for Hayekâs temporary medical insurance? One obvious answer: because the state had already offered a better and freer program. But perhaps Kochâs stinginess also reveals the social ethic behind libertarian values: every man for himself; selfishness is a virtue. Are libertarians church goers?