Stop. The payout was approved. Either he made the money or he didn't. What rationale would anyone have to deny an approved payout retroactively? You're in the weeds and clearly don't know what you're talking about.
I believe he was on a sim but it's irrelevant as APEX states it's a production/real money account and there is provenance; he's been paid out on the account in the past. WTF is wrong with you ppl?
Youre a dumbass. It doesnt matter if its "sim or live" - you still have to follow the 30% rule you fuckin idiot. YOu dont even know the 30% rule talkin about 'hes been paid out in the past" that doesnt matter. You are a fuckin moron OP has given no details on his account and how he got to 100k. Shut the fuck up you idiot.
he did fface??? English you sorry fuck. DOnt be scared to say the real words pussy. Ok? approved - people dont make mistakes? Apex says they can go back and look at your trades after an approval. Just because its approved doesnt mean something cant get looked into after an approval. This happens in real life too you dipshit. OP needs to describe his side - Account size (50k, 100k) etc, with proof, and how he was trading - as in what he was making on a daily basis. Conveniently, he left those out. I wonder why.
Your trades are hitting the tape... you accumulate near 100K in gains and miss a R/R figure by a tick and your backer takes it all away? Trading on sim for a payout is OTC dealing and he would be violating every rule on the books.
Good Morning demoncore, WOW, nice find. That is a VERY nice horse. Did he pay $1.5 million for that horse?