America's Drug Crisis: Brought to You by the CIA Wed, 10/28/2009 - 14:32 http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/?q=node/408 Next time you see a junkie sprawled at the curb in the downtown of your nearest city, or read about someone who died of a heroin overdose, just imagine a big yellow sign posted next to him or her saying: âYour Federal Tax Dollars at Work.â Kudos to the New York Times, and to reporters Dexter Filkins, Mark Mazzetti and James Risen, for their lead article today reporting that Ahmed Wali Karzai, brother of Afghanistanâs stunningly corrupt President Hamid Karzai, a leading drug lord in the worldâs major opium-producing nation, has for eight years been on the CIA payroll. Okay, the article was lacking much historical perspective (more on that later), and the dead hand of top editors was evident in the overly cautious tone (I loved the third paragraph, which stated that âThe financial ties and close working relationship between the intelligence agency and Mr. Karzai raises significant questions about Americaâs war strategy, which is currently under review at the White House.â Well, duh! It should be raising questions about why we are even in Afghanistan, about who should be going to jail at the CIA, and about how can the government explain this to the families of the over 1000 soldiers and Marines who have died supposedly helping to build a new Afghanistan). But that said, the newspaper that helped cheerlead us into the pointless and criminal Iraq invasion in 2003, and that prevented journalist Risen from running his exposÃ© of the Bush/Cheney administrationâs massive warrantless National Security Agency electronic spying operation until after the 2004 presidential election, this time gave a critically important story full timely play, and even, appropriately, included a teaser in the same front-page story about October being the most deadly month yet for the US in Afghanistan. What the article didnât mention at all is that there is a clear historical pattern here. During the Vietnam War, the CIA, and its Air America airline front-company, were neck deep in the Southeast Asian heroin trade. At the time, it was Southeast Asia, not Afghanistan, that was the leading producer and exporter of opium, mostly to the US, where there was a resulting heroin epidemic. A decade later, in the 1980s, during the Reagan administration, as the late investigative journalist Gary Webb so brilliantly documented first in a series titled âDark Allianceâ in the San Jose Mercury News newspaper, and later in a book by that same name, the CIA was deeply involved in the development of and smuggling of cocaine into the US, which was soon engulfed in a crack cocaine epidemicâone that continues to destroy African American and other poor communities across the country. (The Times' role here was sordidâit and other leading papers, including the Washington Post and Los Angeles Timesâdid despicable hit pieces on Webb shamelessly trashing his work and his career, and ultimately driving him to suicide, though his facts have held up.) In this case, Webb showed that the Agency was actually using the drugs as a way to fund arms, which it could use its own planes to ferry down to the Contra forces it was backing to subvert the Sandinista government in Nicaragua at a time Congress had barred the US from supporting the Contras. And now we have Afghanistan, once a sleepy backwater of the world with little connection to drugs (the Taliban, before their overthrow by US forces in 2001, had, according to the UN, virtually eliminated opium production there), but now responsible for as much as 80 percent of the worldâs opium productionâthis at a time that the US effectively finances and runs the place, with an occupying army that, together with Afghan government forces that it controls, outnumbers the Taliban 12-1 according to a recent AP story. The real story here is that where the US goes, the drug trade soon follows, and the leading role in developing and nurturing that trade appears to be played by the Central Intelligence Agency. Your tax dollars at work. The issue at this point should not be how many troops the US should add to its total in Afghanistan. It shouldnât even be over whether the US should up the ante or scale back to a more limited goal of hunting terrorists. It should be about how quickly the US can extricate its forces from Afghanistan, how soon the Congress can start hearings into corruption and drug pushing by the CIA, and how soon the Attorney General's office will begin a grand jury probe into the CIA's drug dealing. Americans, who for years have supported a stupid, blundering and ineffective âWar on Drugsâ in this country, and who mindlessly back âzero-toleranceâ policies towards drugs in schools and on the job, should demand a âzero-toleranceâ policy toward drugs and dealing with drug pushers in government and foreign policy, including the CIA. For years we have been fed the story that the Taliban are being financed by their taxes on opium farmers. That may be partly true, but recently weâve been learning that itâs not the real story. Taliban forces in Afghanistan, it turns out, have been heavily subsidized by protection money paid to them by civilian aid organizations, including even American government-funded aid programs, and even, reportedly, by the military forces of some of Americaâs NATO allies (there is currently a scandal in Italy concerning such payments by Italian forces). But beyond that, the opium industry, far from being controlled by the Taliban, has been, to a great extent, controlled by the very warlords with which the US has allied itself, and, as the Times now reports, by Ahmed Wali Karzai, the presidentâs own brother. Karzai, we are also told by Filkins, Mazzetti and Risen, was a key player in producing hundreds of thousands of fraudulent ballots for his brotherâs election theft earlier this year. Left unsaid is whether the CIA might have played a role in that scam too. In a country where finding printing presses is sure to be difficult, and where transporting bales of counterfeit ballots is risky, you have to wonder whether an agency like the CIA, which has ready access to printers and to helicopters, might have had a hand in keeping its assets in control in Kabul. Sure thatâs idle speculation on my part, but when you learn that Americaâs spook agency has been keeping not just Karzai, but lots of other unsavory Afghani warlords, on its payroll, such speculation is only logical. The real attitude of the CIA here was best illustrated by an anonymous quote in the Filkins, Mazzetti and Risen piece, where a âformer CIA officer with experience in Afghanistan,â explaining the agencyâs backing of Karzai, said, âVirtually every significant Afghan figure has had brushes with the drug trade. If you are looking for Mother Teresa, she doesnât live in Afghanistan.â âThe end justifies the meansâ is Americaâs foreign policy and military motto, clearly. The Times article exposing the CIA link to Afghanistanâs drug-kingpin presidential brother should be the last straw for Americans. President Obamaâs ânecessaryâ war in Afghanistan is nothing but a sick joke. The opium, and resulting heroin, that is flooding into Europe and America thanks to the CIAâs active support of the industry and its owners in Afghanistan are doing far more grave damage to our societies than any turbaned terrorists armed with suicide bomb vests could hope to inflict. The Afghanistan War has to be ended now. Let the prosecution of Americaâs government drug pushers begin. A note about Sen. John Kerry (D-MA): Kerry, who went to Afghanistan to press, for the Obama administration, to get his "good friend" President Karzai to agree to a run-off election after his earlier theft of the first round, has played a shameful role here. Once, back when he still had an ounce of the principle that he had back when he was a Vietnam Vet against the Indochina War, Kerry held hearings on the CIA's cocaine for arms operation in Central America. Now he's hugging the CIA's drug connections.