...DNC staffers were the source of the leaks. Not Russia. Julian Assange said himself Russia wasn't the source of the leaks. But White Hats...
...did not know hillary had a private email... etc. We don't know Assange lies. Assange strikes me as smart enough as know his whole mission...
...and those calling Putin the one responsible. You can't even prove Assange is his "front man"! There has been no proof of anything. Just...
[IMG]
Ah, I see. So, just curious but at what point do you, Freddy, admit that there was never any evidence? Is it after Trump is elected? Or do you...
...we'll have to wait and see, which is what I had mentioned a few days ago. But until then, your role as Putin's and Assange's cheerleader is safe.
It's not the collective US Intelligence Findings. We went through this before when you posted the HuffPo link stating that 17 intelligence...
Achilles, You chose to believe in certain things, and I believe in different ones. Weiner makes me sick, as he would any normal human being. I...
...White hats in the NSA did. That's all on record according to Assange and William Binney. The other dumps came from Seth Rich. The NYPD...
Why didn't Obama do anything about it? It has been going on for years. Furthermore, he did nothing when China hacked Sony. He did nothing when...
...going to treat the collective US intelligence findings and Putin's/Assange's denials as nothing more than an annoying case of "he said/she...
The CIA also had evidence of Saddam's continued WMD programs. The CIA said so and even produced a document. Do you still believe Saddam had WMDs?...
Nothing has been validated at all. You've got a hypothesis. That's about it. I accept everyone's innocence until proven guilty. That's kinda...
Both Assange and Putin have specific axes to grind against Hillary Clinton. I will assume you know why. US intelligence ties the hacks to the...
I'm not the one being obtuse. Even if Assange cannot be taken at his word, doesn't mean it's the Russians. You've gone from Assange releases...
Now you're being obtuse. It just means that Assange cannot be taken at his word. Did I really have to explain that to you? The intelligence...
Even if he did have an axe to grind with just Clinton and no other politicians (the past shows this is not true) that makes it Russia's fault?
Because, as someone who has an axe to grind with Hillary Clinton, Assange is...impartial?
Actually, I don't believe Putin. I do, however, believe Assange when he stated unequivocally that the Russians had nothing to do with the leak...
...recent examples 4. CIA investigators don’t agree on assessment 5. Assange and colleague both stated info not from Russians but from inside...
Separate names with a comma.