HOME FORUMS BROKERS SOFTWARE BOOKS CONTACT US
Elite Trader Your Account  •  Become a Member  •  Help  •  Search    
    Forums ›› Trading for a Living ›› Journals ›› Something very simplistic  


Post A Reply
    Page 145 of 146:   « First Page   136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144   145  146  
Dik_Burns
 

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 54

 

10-18-02 02:26 PM

I am no "detractor", I am stating obvious fact. I also thanked Quah for his efforts here. And I agree that he can walk away anytime.

BUT the fact remains this project is incomplete. That's all I am saying, no big deal, nothing to get huffy about, just an observation.

Peace.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
dbphoenix
 

Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 6730

 

10-18-02 04:32 PM


Originally posted by patefern
If you, or anyone who works with this method cares to post I would like to read it, as this thread has been fascinating.



I wouldn't say that I "work" with it, but I do track it along with my usual method. So far, it doesn't do substantially better than what I'm doing now unless I trade multiple contracts, which I'm not prepared to do after having tracked it for only a couple of weeks.

There are, however, as I've suggested, a number of variations that could be played, such as using a different stop, or a different time series, or a different target, etc. For one person to track all these variations would take a great deal of time. But given the number of people who have shown interest in this thread, it should not be necessary for one person to carry such a load.

--Db

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
traderkay
 

Registered: Jun 2001
Posts: 1072

 

10-28-02 04:06 AM

Quah as may be your final contribution.. could you post the final results for the SVS and an equity curve for us dreamers in the audience

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
Sophomore Jinx
 

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 81

 

10-28-02 08:17 PM

Traderkay -

I've been tracking SVS since Quah's month-long experiment ended on 10/11.

Since then, SVS is only up around $400.00 total (and today hasn't been good, either, so it could be around breakeven by the end of the trading day). SVS had a nice, profitable week from 10/14-10/18 in both ES and NQ, then last week gave back almost everything. Bad week in ES, particularly.

I'm going to continue to track it daily for a few more weeks - but I really think it needs to be backtested to get at least an approximation of how well it holds up over time. One bad week, or a breakeven month, really means little in the big picture.

Just as a quick observation, I took a peek (a very quick one) at daily charts from the 9/11-10/11 period Quah traded it live, and it seemed SVS did much better during trending phases - otherwise, it got chopped up. There would hopefully be ways to address this and fix it...maybe fading the system during choppy periods (maybe an ADX filter or something...)?

Like you, I'm still interested in this method - at the very least, the core ideas of trading by appointment and using simple indicators and profit/loss targets. At the same time, I'm not convinced any of those ideas really work!

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
man
 

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 2179

 

03-12-03 11:57 AM

Is anyone making money with this approach?


peace

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
harrytrader
 

Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 5659

 

03-12-03 10:18 PM

because people are rationally supposed to trade PRICE not TIME huh

The fact to take fibo numbers perhaps insure somehow independance of sampling whereas fixed time interval would be less good if market follows golden ratio law and that is the case (see for example the link of Orlin Grab article about the haussdorf dimension of 1/PHI - also my model shows it numerically whereas theorically I didn't inject any golden ratio as input, but as output it appears. I have still to investigate why but I have some ideas). But it doesn't alone permit the system to be winner so the edge must also come from the other setup criteria. I didn't read the whole threads in detail so it is just my two cents.



Quote from Quah:



Sure it does - it might be a positive edge or a negative edge, but it is certainly different from choosing a totally random entry point. Entering on a fixed time is no different from entering on any other indicator - be it mathematical or subjective. Some people enter a trade when the fast and slow stochastics lines cross below 20 - how is that any different (edge wise) than entering a trade when the clock says 9:33?

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
    Page 145 of 146:   « First Page   136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144   145  146  
Post A Reply


Receive an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing to it.
 
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:
 

 

   Conduct Rules  -  Privacy Policy  -  Day Trader -  Day Trader Forum -  Best Trading Software -  Sitemap Copyright © 2013, Elite Trader. All rights reserved.    
 
WHILE YOU'RE HERE, TAKE A MINUTE TO VISIT SOME OF OUR SPONSORS:
Advantage Futures
Futures Brokerage & Clearing
AMP Global Clearing
Futures and FX Trading
Bright Trading
Professional Equities Trading
CTS
Futures Trading Software
DaytradingBias.com
Professional Trading Analytics
ECHOtrade
Professional Trading Firm
eSignal
Trading Software Provider
FXCM
Forex Trading Services
Global Futures
Futures, Options & FX Trading
Interactive Brokers
Pro Gateway to World Markets
JC Trading Group
Direct Access Trading
MB Trading
Direct Access Trading
MultiCharts
Trading Software Provider
NinjaTrader
Trading Software Provider
OANDA
Currency Trading
optionshouse
Option Trading & Education
Rithmic
Futures Trade Execution Platform
SpeedTrader
Direct Access Trading
SpreadProfessor
Spread Trading Instruction
thinkorswim by TD Ameritrade
Direct Access TradingAdvertisement
TradersStudio
System Building & Backtesting
Trading Technologies
Trading Software Provider
Trend Following
Trading Systems Provider