HOME FORUMS BROKERS SOFTWARE BOOKS CONTACT US
Elite Trader Your Account  •  Become a Member  •  Help  •  Search    
    Forums ›› Community Lounge ›› Politics & Religion ›› Atheists Prevaricating  


Post A Reply
    Page 1 of 24:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10     Last Page »
mike oxbig
 

Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 144

 

09-01-12 08:04 PM

How many times have you heard an atheist say that "there are no credible scientists who do not believe in evolution"?

If you aren't deaf, plenty.

It's not any more true than when we were told that all credible scientists believe in man made global warming.

Why the pattern of prevaricating?

Here's over 500 credible scientists that are willing to sign their names to a statement disagreeing with the Darwin theory.

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/vi...download&id=660

Shutting down the debate is part of the atheist playbook. When their playbook is exposed, they don't look quite as smart as they would like you to believe.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
deltastrike
 

Registered: Jan 2011
Posts: 169

 

09-01-12 08:21 PM

So less than .1% of the scientific community?

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
pspr
 

Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 16481

 

09-01-12 10:47 PM

There are plenty of problems with evolution. Not the least of which is the fact that man is at the end of his evolution and cannot evolve any further under Darwin's theory. The only thing man has to look forward to are breakdowns in the genetic code.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
deltastrike
 

Registered: Jan 2011
Posts: 169

 

09-01-12 11:09 PM


Quote from pspr:

There are plenty of problems with evolution. Not the least of which is the fact that man is at the end of his evolution and cannot evolve any further under Darwin's theory. The only thing man has to look forward to are breakdowns in the genetic code.



By "Darwin's theory" do you mean the the theory of evolution? Because they're not the exactly the same thing...Darwin formulated the basis for the theory, since then it has been modified and built upon. Also, humans are not the end of "his evolution", we're merely and currently the end of one phylogenic branch. I suggest reading the wikipedia's high level overview about the theory of evolution so you can get a better handle on what it entails.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
pspr
 

Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 16481

 

09-01-12 11:11 PM


Quote from deltastrike:

By "Darwin's theory" do you mean the the theory of evolution? Because they're not the exactly the same thing...Darwin formulated the basis for the theory, since then it has been modified and built upon. Also, humans are not the end of "his evolution", we're merely and currently the end of one phylogenic branch. I suggest reading the wikipedia's high level overview about the theory of evolution so you can get a better handle on what it entails.


Correct. Man cannot evolve any further in a positive way. However, genetic defects can be introduced into the gene pool. It's a fact. One only has to think for a while about what must happen for evolution to take place.

EDIT: Well, there is one way man could evolve. If a superior being was in control of the evolution process, changes could be made in the overall population through manipulation by that being.

Also, some changes could occur through widespread sexual selection but I don't see how that could happen. But it could happen through sterility of certain members but that would effect little more than sexuality.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
deltastrike
 

Registered: Jan 2011
Posts: 169

 

09-01-12 11:18 PM


Quote from pspr:

Correct. Man cannot evolve any further in a positive way. However, genetic defects can be introduced into the gene pool. It's a fact.



How do you know that we can't evolve any further in a positive way? There could be an extreme environmental pressure that stresses our population, then an inheritable trait, whether it be derived via mutation or recessive inheritance (read: non-prominent gene) could become dominant in our population, thus causing us to evolve to increase our survivability. Man, as we stand now, are somewhat outside these environmental pressures as we can control most of them to some extent...which in itself is a form of evolution via technological progress. Currently being at the end of one phylogenic branch does not necessarily mean it's finished growing. Learn anything from wikipedia yet?

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
    Page 1 of 24:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10     Last Page »
Post A Reply


Receive an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing to it.
 
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:
 

 

   Conduct Rules  -  Privacy Policy  -  Day Trader -  Day Trader Forum -  Best Trading Software -  Sitemap Copyright © 2013, Elite Trader. All rights reserved.    
 
WHILE YOU'RE HERE, TAKE A MINUTE TO VISIT SOME OF OUR SPONSORS:
Advantage Futures
Futures Brokerage & Clearing
AMP Global Clearing
Futures and FX Trading
Bright Trading
Professional Equities Trading
CTS
Futures Trading Software
DaytradingBias.com
Professional Trading Analytics
ECHOtrade
Professional Trading Firm
eSignal
Trading Software Provider
FXCM
Forex Trading Services
Global Futures
Futures, Options & FX Trading
Interactive Brokers
Pro Gateway to World Markets
JC Trading Group
Direct Access Trading
MB Trading
Direct Access Trading
MultiCharts
Trading Software Provider
NinjaTrader
Trading Software Provider
OANDA
Currency Trading
optionshouse
Option Trading & Education
Rithmic
Futures Trade Execution Platform
SpeedTrader
Direct Access Trading
SpreadProfessor
Spread Trading Instruction
thinkorswim by TD Ameritrade
Direct Access TradingAdvertisement
TradersStudio
System Building & Backtesting
Trading Technologies
Trading Software Provider
Trend Following
Trading Systems Provider