HOME FORUMS BROKERS SOFTWARE BOOKS CONTACT US
Elite Trader Your Account  •  Become a Member  •  Help  •  Search    
    Forums ›› Community Lounge ›› Politics & Religion ›› why would any thinking woman vote for paul ryan?  


Post A Reply
    Page 1 of 6:   1  2  3  4  5  6  
Free Thinker
 

Registered: Nov 1999
Posts: 14316

 

08-15-12 05:40 PM

Paul Ryan and Reproductive Rights
August 15, 2012 at 12:02 pm Ed Brayton
As journalists and pundits dig into Paul Ryan’s record in the House, it’s looking worse and worse for women’s rights. Ryan isn’t just your run of the mill Republican when it comes to reproductive rights, he’s on the ultra far right of the party. If he had his way, even the most popular forms of birth control would be illegal. Yes, you heard that right.

Ryan is one of the sponsors of a federal personhood bill, which would declare that any fertilized ovum “shall have all the legal and constitutional attributes and privileges of personhood.” The bill would not just ban abortions, it would ban hormonal birth control — that is, the pill — as well, because such contraception works by preventing implantation of the fertilized egg in the uterus. And there are no exceptions even for rape and incest. That idea is so extreme that it was rejected soundly even by ultra-conservative Mississippi two years ago. It’s been rejected all over the country by wide margins. It’s wildly unpopular, even among Republicans.

But that’s just the beginning. He actually goes even further than that. Remember that terrible Virginia bill that would force any woman seeking an abortion to undergo an invasive ultrasound even if their doctor says it’s medically unnecessary? Ryan is one of the sponsors of a bill, the Ultrasound Informed Consent Act, to do that on the federal level. This, again, puts him on the furthest right wing fringe of his own party.

Mitt Romney has tried to have it both ways on this issue. He was pro-choice — he once told a story about a family friend who died from a botched abortion to explain why he was pro-choice and said “You will never hear me waver on that” — until he decided to run for president because he knew he couldn’t win the Republican nomination without sounding stridently anti-choice. So last year he said he “absolutely” supported a personhood amendment.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatc...ductive-rights/

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
TheDudeofLife
 

Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 893

 

08-15-12 07:05 PM

Most women I know make decisions on feeling not thinking.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
Yannis
 

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 5286

 

08-15-12 07:13 PM

Obama's War On Women



    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
Free Thinker
 

Registered: Nov 1999
Posts: 14316

 

08-15-12 07:19 PM


Quote from TheDudeofLife:

Most women I know make decisions on feeling not thinking.


thinking young men should not vote for ryan either. if they thought about in they might come to this conclusion.

holy crap if these guys win and get everything they want it means no more birth control and no abortions. that means every young guy who lays a woman just for fun could potentially be caught in a trap that could cost them for 18 years.

i am guessing that is not something young guys in their skirt chasing years would think is a good thing.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
Free Thinker
 

Registered: Nov 1999
Posts: 14316

 

08-15-12 07:20 PM


Quote from Yannis:

Obama's War On Women






and republicans would fix this by cutting off their safety net?

they arent stupid enough to buy into that.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
Yannis
 

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 5286

 

08-15-12 07:38 PM


Quote from Free Thinker:

and republicans would fix this by cutting off their safety net? ...

The Repubs would make it possible for them to get jobs, have a family and live productive lives in dignity. Unlike the dems who are just treating them like powerless nincompoops. All this stupidity with the Fluke character: women want jobs, financial security and freedom, not some so-called "gift" of free birth control that costs $9/mo!

Repubs think of the safety net as a last resort, to be needed/used very rarely. Obama has extended it to 110+ million people who are too stupid to see that his net is a trap of poverty and misery, a safety net motel of sorts, where you go in but cannot go out despite the fact that you vote for your liberal owners every time to keep the free stuff coming.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
    Page 1 of 6:   1  2  3  4  5  6  
Post A Reply


Receive an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing to it.
 
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:
 

 

   Conduct Rules  -  Privacy Policy  -  Day Trader -  Day Trader Forum -  Best Trading Software -  Sitemap Copyright © 2013, Elite Trader. All rights reserved.    
 
WHILE YOU'RE HERE, TAKE A MINUTE TO VISIT SOME OF OUR SPONSORS:
Advantage Futures
Futures Brokerage & Clearing
AMP Global Clearing
Futures and FX Trading
Bright Trading
Professional Equities Trading
CTS
Futures Trading Software
DaytradingBias.com
Professional Trading Analytics
ECHOtrade
Professional Trading Firm
eSignal
Trading Software Provider
FXCM
Forex Trading Services
Global Futures
Futures, Options & FX Trading
Interactive Brokers
Pro Gateway to World Markets
JC Trading Group
Direct Access Trading
MB Trading
Direct Access Trading
MultiCharts
Trading Software Provider
NinjaTrader
Trading Software Provider
OANDA
Currency Trading
optionshouse
Option Trading & Education
Rithmic
Futures Trade Execution Platform
SpeedTrader
Direct Access Trading
SpreadProfessor
Spread Trading Instruction
thinkorswim by TD Ameritrade
Direct Access TradingAdvertisement
TradersStudio
System Building & Backtesting
Trading Technologies
Trading Software Provider
Trend Following
Trading Systems Provider