 |
rwk
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 999 |
03-23-12 03:51 AM
Quote from vikana:
That's unfortunately not new. I have never been able to match things up to the penny. It's always off by a little bit, typically less than one dollar over a year. I suspect it's rounding, as I've never been able to find the discrepancies.
My yearend reports matched the monthlies to the penny until I switched to IB's unbundled commissions. Since then, they have always been off by a few dollars. That bothered me at first, but now I don't sweat it. I think the variances are due to fees and rebates coming in late. I make sure my tax return matches the 1099 though.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
Don87109
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 300 |
03-23-12 02:17 PM
Quote from vikana:
That's unfortunately not new. I have never been able to match things up to the penny. It's always off by a little bit, typically less than one dollar over a year. I suspect it's rounding, as I've never been able to find the discrepancies.
A couple of week ago I had this crazy idea to import 2010 and 2011 into Quicken in the hopes of getting accurate accounting with wash loss etc. That produced a third and different result for cost base etc. Sort of embarrassing ...
Last time I tried to use Quicken it seemed to have flaws for stock trading. Or at least very inconvenient to use. As I recall it did not handle short stock sales very well. I think it kept adding shares or some other inconvenient stuff, I don't recall the details. Anyway that was a couple of years ago.
I assume that Quicken has fixed these problems based on your ability to import two whole years of transactions. Can you expand a little bit on how you did that? Did you download the IB monthly statements for each month?
BTW, when you say "it was sort of embarrassing" did you mean that Quicken gave bad results?
Don
P.S. my IB 1099 also doesn't look right and I'd like to see what Quicken says.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
Robert A. Green
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 656 |
03-23-12 03:33 PM
Quote from jackpearson:
Mr. Green,
Last week you mentioned a push to hold off on the cost basis rules for this year. Do you have any updates on that?
Thanks
Should I write up a Petition to Rally Congress on this matter?
Earlier this week, I emailed top IRS people in leading roles for cost-basis reporting our request that the IRS computers not match taxpayer Form 8949 filings to broker-provided 1099-Bs. I asked the IRS to read all our content on cost-basis reporting problems.
I understand a leading national CPA accounting group is working on a similar request, but they are moving more slowly, which is expected for institutions arranging actions by meetings and consensus. Hopefully, the IRS is informed on what is happening and they are seeing very botched Form 1099-Bs filed by brokers, and Form 8949's filed by taxpayers. The IRS needs to provide some relief for taxpayers soon.
I don’t think the IRS will waive Form 8949 and the IRS can’t ask brokers to issue 1099-Bs under the old rules. This means we all have to struggle through cost-basis reporting this tax filing season.
Maybe, I should write up an online petition to Rally Congress like I did for blocking financial-transaction taxes. Would you all sign the petition and spread the word for other traders to sign it too? Congress passed these new rules and they should be responsible to taxpayers’ for correcting this confusion, unfair cost and pain.
Here is new content (next post) on our Cost-Basis Reporting page http://www.greencompany.com/Educati...eporting.shtml.
Perhaps, I can start with this content for the petition. Please add your comments for inclusion in the petition too.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
Robert A. Green
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 656 |
03-23-12 03:34 PM
The Basics on Cost-Basis Reporting:
If you trade or invest in securities, you need to learn about “cost-basis reporting,” a new set of IRS rules for taxpayers starting with 2011 tax filings. Previously, taxpayers could simply enter their capital gains and losses (proceeds, cost basis and holding period) onto Schedule D of their individual income tax return. That’s no longer allowed and get ready for a real mess.
Under the new cost-basis reporting regime, taxpayers must decipher broker-provided Form 1099-Bs. In prior years, taxpayers and their accountants could easily use a Form 1099-B to enter proceeds from each securities sale on their Schedule D. Taxpayers then entered their own record of cost-basis information and they were done. Investors often looked up the original purchase price in an earlier year brokerage statement and considered stock splits or other corporate actions, which are rare. Active traders generally used software like TradeLog, which downloaded all trade executions and provided an easy-to-use Schedule D-1 attachment.
You would think that when brokers entered the picture providing cost-basis information to taxpayers and the IRS on Form 1099-Bs, taxpayer compliance would be easier. You would be very wrong!
Take one look at your Form 1099-B and you will see the problem. While stock proceeds may look the same as prior years, the new cost-basis information is extremely confusing. Some Brokers mark cost information with quirky new codes like P (provided to the IRS), N (not provided to the IRS) and W (wash sales). Some brokers do not provide totals for the amounts they are reporting. Plus there are covered securities, non-covered securities and other. All individual trades must be entered on the new tax form 8949, which includes Parts A (proceeds and cost basis both reported to the IRS), B (proceeds reported to the IRS but not cost basis) and C (other or not reported on a 1099). Separate Form 8949s must be filed for short term and long term. Add it up: That’s up to six different categories on the Form 8949s instead of the single Schedule D required in the past. This is a huge burden and is very confusing for taxpayers.
That’s just a fraction of the problem. It turns out the rules brokers are required to follow for 1099-B reporting are different from the rules for taxpayers. For example, brokers report “potential wash sales” based on “identical positions” (same symbol), whereas taxpayers must report actual wash sales based on “substantially identical positions” (between stock and options). There’s a long list of other problems on wash sales, too.
Wash sales are a major factor for investors and traders. Using a 1099-B for wash sale reporting is a big mistake. IRS cost-basis reporting rules state that taxpayers should not rely on 1099-Bs for tax reporting purposes. What?
The IRS requires brokers to only report 2011 cost basis on “covered” securities. Most brokers don’t include 2010 cost basis, which means they omit wash sales losses deferred from 2010. The IRS should have required standardization, as broker reporting is all over the map. Many brokers are making errors too.
Phasing in the rules seems to be part of the problem. While the IRS phased in the new rules for brokers, it did not do so for taxpayers. The IRS hammers taxpayers by deputizing them as accountants to figure out all the inevitable discrepancies between 1099-Bs and Form 8949 results.
What’s happening? Most investors and active traders are upset, throwing in the towel and filing extensions. They’re being forced to hire accountants and experts when they’re accustomed to preparing their own tax returns with consumer software. Unsuspecting taxpayers are filing and not realizing they’re either overpaying or underpaying their taxes. The devil is in the details — errors on Form 8949 are compounded onto Schedule D, and the final Schedule Ds don’t add up.
Taxpayers have no confidence on wash sales — they’re extremely hard to figure out by hand.
We suggest reading our blogs on this saga to understand the new IRS rules, how 1099-Bs are constructed and how you should handle Form 8949. We recommend using software like TradeLog and filing an extension. We hope for relief from the IRS soon.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
tomahawk
Registered: Apr 2007
Posts: 1952 |
03-25-12 11:29 PM
Quote from Robert A. Green:
Eric has it right. He broke the chain on wash sales - making them all go away - by not trading any substantially-identical positions in December.
I'll check the broker 1099 preparation rules to see if they are making an error in reporting potential wash sales versus actual wash sales. Remember, broker and taxpayer tax rules are apples and oranges. See my first Mar. 20 blog on that.
Robert, thank you for all the valuable info you've shared in this thread.
Re the not trading anything in Dec. making wash sales "go away" ... any advice on how to handle the situation where my broker statements say otherwise? (they show "disallowable wash sales" figures even though I had no securities trades whatsoever in all of December 2011).
Maybe I don't understand the way they work, but I too was under the impression wash sales would be a non-issue if I stopped all trading other than futures for the month of December.
Also, other than wash sales issues, for the new 2011 rules do I have all the information necessary to correctly complete the forms if I have my own accurate tally of a) cost basis, b) sales price, and c) proceeds(gain or loss), including commisions, for each trade? .... Thx
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
| Receive
an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing
to it. |
|
|
|
|
