HOME FORUMS BROKERS SOFTWARE BOOKS CONTACT US
Elite Trader Your Account  •  Become a Member  •  Help  •  Search    
    Forums ›› Main ›› Options ›› Reverse Iron Condors  


Post A Reply
    Page 5 of 16:   1  2  3  4   5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14     Last Page »
spindr0
 

Registered: Nov 2005
Posts: 4166

 

03-09-12 02:27 AM


Quote from jkgraham:

Has anyone ever bought Reverse Iron Condors before earnings? They look like an interesting alternative to Straddles and Strangles because they "could" costs less and have a smaller window of failure, but with less profit as the trade-off. If you use them, do you have any rules or suggestions on how to implement them? Would you do them on the weeklies? It looks interesting but doesn't get much attention. I wonder why?

Not a good idea. The IV contraction is going to whack the body more and move to strike will whack the other side.

For the short wings, the IV contraction gain is smaller and the smaller premium doesn't offset the losses from the long strad until well outside a short strike.

And then there's mlutiple leg slippage and commish.

Diagonalized positions may be of interest in high month to moth skew situations but that's another story.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
spindr0
 

Registered: Nov 2005
Posts: 4166

 

03-09-12 02:28 AM


Quote from newwurldmn:

But if you are going to buy volatility for a big move, why would you cap your upside by selling anything. Especially when they are deep otm wings where premium received is small and convexity risks are very high.

If he's buying volatility pre EA, he better be darn good at picking big movers.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
spindr0
 

Registered: Nov 2005
Posts: 4166

 

03-09-12 02:39 AM


Quote from jkgraham:

In other words buy two ATM options (+1 PUT and +1 CALL) and sell (-1 CALL) one strike up and sell (-1 PUT) one strike down. The result was about a 10% gain with a breakeven range one strike above and below the center. It's cheaper than both the Straddle and Strangle, has less chance of losing but a lower return.

Because there are multiple variables involved (skew, strike width, amt of IV expansion, time until exp, time held, etc.), there isn't a one size fits all answer. But as a generalization, I doubt that you're going to net a 10% gain on a move to short strike one out. And since IC's a relatively low cost, 10% avg gain isn't a great result considering the slippage.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
newwurldmn
 

Registered: Apr 2011
Posts: 2628

 

03-09-12 03:00 AM


Quote from jkgraham:

So would you be willing to trade 'A' instead of 'B' if it succeeded more often even though it paid less?



Because the probabilities over the long run matter. Remember you are taking the view that a big move will happen. There's no point buying volatility if you don't think the makret is mispricing the probability of a big move is there. Otherwise you are paying too much because options price in that Convexity (There's that big word again).

Say earnings are pricing 5%. You think the stock is going to move 6%. That is not a compelling trade. If you think the stock is going to move 10%, it is very compelling. If you think the stock will move 6% and has a possibility of moving 10%, then it's compelling enough to do the trade.

The market won't give you much for selling the 10% move risk. The market won't give you much for the 7% move risk. So why bother?

Payouts in options are not like stocks. They are lumpy. Lots of small gains and a few big ones. Which side you are on during the many small gains and the few bigs ones culminate in your total pnl.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
jkgraham
 

Registered: Apr 2011
Posts: 79

 

03-09-12 03:09 AM


Quote from spindr0:

Not a good idea. The IV contraction is going to whack the body more and move to strike will whack the other side.

For the short wings, the IV contraction gain is smaller and the smaller premium doesn't offset the losses from the long strad until well outside a short strike.

And then there's mlutiple leg slippage and commish.

Diagonalized positions may be of interest in high month to moth skew situations but that's another story.



On the RIC, if the underlying moves up or down more than $5(or one strike) at closing it will make money, end of story. At that point, IV contraction doesn't matter, Convexity doesn't matter.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
EliteTraderNYC
 

Registered: Feb 2008
Posts: 178

 

03-09-12 03:29 AM

An anaconda will help you with the IV contraction. Have you tried that?

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
    Page 5 of 16:   1  2  3  4   5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14     Last Page »
Post A Reply


Receive an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing to it.
 
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:
 

 

   Conduct Rules  -  Privacy Policy  -  Day Trader -  Day Trader Forum -  Best Trading Software -  Sitemap Copyright © 2013, Elite Trader. All rights reserved.    
 
WHILE YOU'RE HERE, TAKE A MINUTE TO VISIT SOME OF OUR SPONSORS:
Advantage Futures
Futures Brokerage & Clearing
AMP Global Clearing
Futures and FX Trading
Bright Trading
Professional Equities Trading
CTS
Futures Trading Software
DaytradingBias.com
Professional Trading Analytics
ECHOtrade
Professional Trading Firm
eSignal
Trading Software Provider
FXCM
Forex Trading Services
Global Futures
Futures, Options & FX Trading
Interactive Brokers
Pro Gateway to World Markets
JC Trading Group
Direct Access Trading
MB Trading
Direct Access Trading
MultiCharts
Trading Software Provider
NinjaTrader
Trading Software Provider
OANDA
Currency Trading
optionshouse
Option Trading & Education
Rithmic
Futures Trade Execution Platform
SpeedTrader
Direct Access Trading
SpreadProfessor
Spread Trading Instruction
thinkorswim by TD Ameritrade
Direct Access TradingAdvertisement
TradersStudio
System Building & Backtesting
Trading Technologies
Trading Software Provider
Trend Following
Trading Systems Provider