 |
atticus
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 12701 |
02-27-12 07:10 PM
Quote from GTS:
Apparently you can't even comprehend the difference between quarterly sales and total subscribers
The only conclusion I made was that Android was outselling iPhone, you have made a lot of excuses why that is the case but you have not refuted it.
I weep for your children. You're a walking-talking PSA for contraception.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
GTS
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 2188 |
02-27-12 07:13 PM
Quote from atticus:
I weep for your children. You're a walking-talking PSA for contraception.
Sad that you can't admit when you were clearly mistaken, trying to correlate quarterly sales with total subscribers, lol. And more lame personal attacks to cover up for your lack of any substantive argument.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
atticus
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 12701 |
02-27-12 07:16 PM
Quote from GTS:
Sad that you can't admit when you were clearly mistaken, trying to correlate quarterly sales with total subscribers, lol. And more lame personal attacks to cover up for your lack of any substantive argument.
Never did. You're attempting to correlate Nov with EOY data. Brilliant.
The Dec numbers show 46% vs. 43%. There are no iPod touch equivalents in the android space. I realize it's not a smartphone, but it's also a factor in that it cannibalizes iPhone sales to some extent.
You're hanging your hat on stats that prove nothing. Apple didn't sell a single 4S until well into Q4.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
GTS
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 2188 |
02-27-12 08:55 PM
Quote from atticus:
Never did.
Really, you didn't attempt to correlate? I wonder why you said all these things then:
"The graph and the tabular data are f*cked."
"The end-points in the two do not match."
"Here's another clue... sales and subs are better than 95% correlated even when supplied from multiple sources, so the 29% figure was obviously stale data."
Duh, that's why the data from the two graphs don't match - they aren't supposed to. And you still won't admit that you were confused when its plainly obvious in every post you wrote, quoted above.
Quote from atticus:
You're hanging your hat on stats that prove nothing. Apple didn't sell a single 4S until well into Q4.
Whatever you say, iPhone 4S accounted for 89 Percent of Apple's Phone Sales in 4Q but apparently you think the 4S sales in the 4Q aren't meaningful....during Christmas no less..
Still waiting for you to produce any stats, all you do is refute anecdotally and make excuses but you provide no data to back anything you say up.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
atticus
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 12701 |
02-27-12 09:03 PM
Quote from GTS:
Really, you didn't attempt to correlate? I wonder why you said all these things then:
"The graph and the tabular data are f*cked."
"The end-points in the two do not match."
"Here's another clue... sales and subs are better than 95% correlated even when supplied from multiple sources, so the 29% figure was obviously stale data."
Duh, that's why the data from the two graphs don't match - they aren't supposed to. And you still won't admit that you were confused when its plainly obvious in every post you wrote, quoted above.
Whatever you say, iPhone 4S accounted for 89 Percent of Apple's Phone Sales in 4Q but apparently you think the 4S sales in the 4Q aren't meaningful....during Christmas no less..
Still waiting for you to produce any stats, all you do is refute anecdotally and make excuses but you provide no data to back anything you say up.
Why post any stats? Yours make my point better than I could have hoped.
Stating they don't correlate isn't an attempt (to correlate).
Hyping sub-stats (table) that booked prior to the release and then ignoring the Dec (chart) SALES stats is your utter failure.
Take some solace in the fact that you never stood a chance.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
| Receive
an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing
to it. |
|
|
|
|
