HOME FORUMS BROKERS SOFTWARE BOOKS CONTACT US
Elite Trader Your Account  •  Become a Member  •  Help  •  Search    
    Forums ›› Community Lounge ›› Politics & Religion ›› Iran Versus Everyone  


Post A Reply
    Page 1 of 10:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  
Trader666
 

Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 8151

 

02-17-12 09:56 PM

Iran Versus Everyone
The Islamic Republic's belligerence threatens more than Israel.
FEBRUARY 17, 2012

Sophisticated commentary about the Islamic Republic of Iran can be a thing to behold: Whenever the mullahs resort openly to terrorism, it's taken by some in the West as a good sign that they're finally serious about negotiations.

So it has been this week, as Iranian agents sought to carry out terrorist attacks against Israeli diplomats in India, Georgia and Thailand. The attempt in Tbilisi was foiled without injury, but the bombing in New Delhi critically injured the wife of one Israeli official and hurt three others. In Bangkok, four Thais were injured when a cache of explosives detonated in an Iranian safe house.

Tehran officially denies involvement. But three Iranian nationals are now under arrest in Thailand, another is on the lam, and a fourth is being extradited to Thailand from Malaysia. If these are the marks of a country that is "ready to talk"—as former Obama Administration diplomat Dennis Ross argued in a New York Times op-ed this week—we'd be interested to know what Iranian actions would qualify as evidence of belligerence. An attempt to bomb Washington, D.C.? Oh, wait: They tried that, too.

The larger story is that Iran is coming close to openly making war on the country it wants to wipe off the map. That's an escalation from the more veiled (and often more deadly) warfare the Islamic Republic has waged against Israeli and Jewish targets for decades. It's also an indication that the mullahs, far from seeking to de-escalate tensions with the West, are scrapping for a fight. They might get one.

It is in nobody's interest, least of all America's, to see a regional war erupt in the Middle East. It is even less in America's interests to back our allies in Jerusalem into a corner where they feel they have no choice other than to fight, as they did in 1967. An Iran that seeks to murder diplomats across the globe is a threat to global security. The U.S. has an even larger interest than Israel in stopping it.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...eTabs%3Darticle

    Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain
pspr
 

Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 16553

 

02-17-12 10:03 PM

There are some very tough decisions that are going to have to be made about Iran in 2012. It seems an oil blockade might be a preferable next step instead of a bombing campaign but it better start soon before it's too late.

    Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain
RCG Trader
 

Registered: Dec 2009
Posts: 10215

 

02-17-12 10:32 PM


Quote from pspr:

There are some very tough decisions that are going to have to be made about Iran in 2012. It seems an oil blockade might be a preferable next step instead of a bombing campaign but it better start soon before it's too late.



We need to figure out a way out of this BS. It is not in our best interest in any way, unless one of you can show how it could be. This is a lose, lose for the USA.

    Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain
Optional
 

Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 868

 

02-18-12 03:50 AM


Quote from RCG Trader:

We need to figure out a way out of this BS. It is not in our best interest in any way, unless one of you can show how it could be. This is a lose, lose for the USA.



America stuck her nose in this business in 1953, and those frothing at the mouth to get involved again need to take a fuckin chill pill...

Go to the Congress, and see if our national security is threatened, and make a vote to declare war.

Otherwise, let us know when you parachute in to Tehran, 666 - I'll send you a care package...

    Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain
dolemitettu
 

Registered: Jan 2012
Posts: 111

 

02-18-12 04:57 AM

Iran just got booted from the SWIFT system. Shit's about to get real.

http://m.apnews.mobi/ap/db_6720/con...ntguid=5457z10H

    Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain
perplexed
 

Registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 84

 

02-18-12 06:54 AM

“However,” Burgess said, “The agency assesses Iran is unlikely to initiate or intentionally provoke a conflict.”
that means: Hey white house guys! dont hurry! Prepare the terroristic attack carefully!

    Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain
    Page 1 of 10:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  
Post A Reply


Receive an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing to it.
 
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:
 

 

   Conduct Rules  -  Privacy Policy  -  Day Trader -  Day Trader Forum -  Best Trading Software -  Sitemap Copyright © 2013, Elite Trader. All rights reserved.    
 
WHILE YOU'RE HERE, TAKE A MINUTE TO VISIT SOME OF OUR SPONSORS:
Advantage Futures
Futures Brokerage & Clearing
AMP Global Clearing
Futures and FX Trading
Bright Trading
Professional Equities Trading
CTS
Futures Trading Software
DaytradingBias.com
Professional Trading Analytics
ECHOtrade
Professional Trading Firm
eSignal
Trading Software Provider
FXCM
Forex Trading Services
Global Futures
Futures, Options & FX Trading
Interactive Brokers
Pro Gateway to World Markets
JC Trading Group
Direct Access Trading
MB Trading
Direct Access Trading
MultiCharts
Trading Software Provider
NinjaTrader
Trading Software Provider
OANDA
Currency Trading
optionshouse
Option Trading & Education
Rithmic
Futures Trade Execution Platform
SpeedTrader
Direct Access Trading
SpreadProfessor
Spread Trading Instruction
thinkorswim by TD Ameritrade
Direct Access TradingAdvertisement
TradersStudio
System Building & Backtesting
Trading Technologies
Trading Software Provider
Trend Following
Trading Systems Provider