HOME FORUMS BROKERS SOFTWARE BOOKS CONTACT US
Elite Trader Your Account  •  Become a Member  •  Help  •  Search    
    Forums ›› Technically Speaking ›› Strategy (System) Design ›› Curve-fitting or just prudent trade selection?  


Post A Reply
    Page 1 of 3:   1  2  3  
logic_man
 

Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 1489

 

11-25-11 07:44 PM

Let's say I've got a model which scores a trade set-up from 1 to 100 based on a number of objective factors. Any price action that triggers the set-up is a valid trade signal, but, historically, only trades which score above a 30 are profitable, in aggregate. Not that all trades under 30 fail, just that the profit factor is below 1. Taking only the trades above 30 yields a profit factor that is much higher and indicative of a robust strategy.

Is ignoring any trade signal which scores below a 30 on the model "curve-fitting" or is it just a case of ignoring similar, yet somehow different, market action?

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
frostengine
 

Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 1215

 

11-26-11 03:18 AM

The idea of "curve fitting" is not necessarily evil by definition. I rely heavily on curve fitting to identify patterns. However, there is a right way to do it and a wrong way.

When you apply the 30 threshold to out of sample data (data not tested to base your decision on using 30) how does it perform? Do the performance metrics stay reasonably in-line? If so, then your fine..

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
logic_man
 

Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 1489

 

11-26-11 05:40 PM


Quote from frostengine:

The idea of "curve fitting" is not necessarily evil by definition. I rely heavily on curve fitting to identify patterns. However, there is a right way to do it and a wrong way.

When you apply the 30 threshold to out of sample data (data not tested to base your decision on using 30) how does it perform? Do the performance metrics stay reasonably in-line? If so, then your fine..



Yes, trades scoring under 30 are performing the same since I noticed that it was a cutoff point between two very different sets of outcomes in real trades. If anything, they're doing a little better than they were before.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
clearinghouse
 

Registered: Aug 2010
Posts: 572

 

11-26-11 06:46 PM


Quote from logic_man:

Let's say I've got a model which scores a trade set-up from 1 to 100 based on a number of objective factors. Any price action that triggers the set-up is a valid trade signal, but, historically, only trades which score above a 30 are profitable, in aggregate. Not that all trades under 30 fail, just that the profit factor is below 1. Taking only the trades above 30 yields a profit factor that is much higher and indicative of a robust strategy.

Is ignoring any trade signal which scores below a 30 on the model "curve-fitting" or is it just a case of ignoring similar, yet somehow different, market action?



Variance-bias trade-off, my good man. You decide how much trade-off you want to make, but just be aware of the consequences.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
logic_man
 

Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 1489

 

11-26-11 07:13 PM


Quote from clearinghouse:

Variance-bias trade-off, my good man. You decide how much trade-off you want to make, but just be aware of the consequences.



That makes sense.

I should also note that the "trigger levels" of the parameters in the model were based on an initial hypothesis of what the levels "should" be. The fact that subsequent empirical evidence has shown that the levels where they "should" be weren't, in fact, the optimal levels seems to me to just be a case of learning that the initial hypothesized levels were somewhat arbitrary, although they were in the ballpark.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
Wide Tailz
 

Registered: Sep 2011
Posts: 1519

 

11-27-11 02:40 AM


Quote from logic_man:

Is ignoring any trade signal which scores below a 30 on the model "curve-fitting" or is it just a case of ignoring similar, yet somehow diffrent, market action?



Every profitable system is a curve fit to some degree, IMO. Some curves last for a few weeks, some a year and others forever. Dow theory still works on the daily, last time I checked.

Old fashioned trend lines are still killing it on the weekly.

Why do these old edges still work? Not every participant in the market has the freedom of waiting to enter. Think farmers hedging every year, or oil exporters recycling petrodollarz..........

Understand who you're taking the money from.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
    Page 1 of 3:   1  2  3  
Post A Reply


Receive an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing to it.
 
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:
 

 

   Conduct Rules  -  Privacy Policy  -  Day Trader -  Day Trader Forum -  Best Trading Software -  Sitemap Copyright © 2013, Elite Trader. All rights reserved.    
 
WHILE YOU'RE HERE, TAKE A MINUTE TO VISIT SOME OF OUR SPONSORS:
Advantage Futures
Futures Brokerage & Clearing
AMP Global Clearing
Futures and FX Trading
Bright Trading
Professional Equities Trading
CTS
Futures Trading Software
DaytradingBias.com
Professional Trading Analytics
ECHOtrade
Professional Trading Firm
eSignal
Trading Software Provider
FXCM
Forex Trading Services
Global Futures
Futures, Options & FX Trading
Interactive Brokers
Pro Gateway to World Markets
JC Trading Group
Direct Access Trading
MB Trading
Direct Access Trading
MultiCharts
Trading Software Provider
NinjaTrader
Trading Software Provider
OANDA
Currency Trading
optionshouse
Option Trading & Education
Rithmic
Futures Trade Execution Platform
SpeedTrader
Direct Access Trading
SpreadProfessor
Spread Trading Instruction
thinkorswim by TD Ameritrade
Direct Access TradingAdvertisement
TradersStudio
System Building & Backtesting
Trading Technologies
Trading Software Provider
Trend Following
Trading Systems Provider