 |
alexvnew
Registered: Apr 2012
Posts: 22 |
05-01-12 06:54 AM
Quote from luckyputanski:
It's funny that aggressive posts started after price action lab was banned from advertising here. Anyway, I can take way more crap than this, so save your breath. And if you really want to show how smart you are - start your own journal and show me this should be done. Something tells me that you won't.
I think it is a classic case of conspiracy theory to accuse collectively all those who noted your blunter of S&P trading starting 223 ago and associate them with your constant efforts to remove material from these threads that points to successful trading system development. I think instead of chasing Price Action Lab or anyone else in an effort to easy your disappointment from a 60% massive loss in just 8 months (which you thought by the way it was only 40% in an extraordinary show of self deception) you should try to see if you can match their results. For example, can you show specific systems backtests in-sample and out-of-sample using reproducible methods like Price Action Lab does in their website under Screen Shots? Can you for example show results for a system for YM, 8 years in-sample and 2-years out -of-sample? Then we can know that you are trading a system and you are not a prankster with random journal entries. I know it hurts when you lose 60% in 8 months and you are exposed in this way when you thought that you would make substantial gains and be a star of ET journal section. For now you are the loser of ET journal section. If it hurts, try becoming a better person. Attacking others with conspiracy theories may be an indication that besides being a bad trader you are also psychologically unstable.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
luckyputanski
Registered: Jul 2011
Posts: 335 |
05-01-12 07:20 AM
Quote from alexvnew:
(which you thought by the way it was only 40% in an extraordinary show of self deception)....
besides being a bad trader you are also psychologically unstable.
Please provide link to my post when I said I'm in 40% DD.
Also, judging by tone of posts here it seems I'm the most psychologically stable of all of you. And don't worry about me being bad trader - I've been trading 8 years and I'm profitable.
Now, chop chop starting your own journal.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
bwolinsky
Registered: Jul 2008
Posts: 4551 |
05-01-12 01:35 PM
Quote from luckyputanski:
Please provide link to my post when I said I'm in 40% DD.
Also, judging by tone of posts here it seems I'm the most psychologically stable of all of you. And don't worry about me being bad trader - I've been trading 8 years and I'm profitable.
Now, chop chop starting your own journal.
$500k to $200k is a 60% drawdown. In fact a $300,000 loss, so if you can't explain the fake equity curve you posted, that alone removes the legitimacy and premise of this thread, because that's not what I see here. I see a $300,000 loss and a 60% drawdown. You started at $500k, and now at $200k.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
alexvnew
Registered: Apr 2012
Posts: 22 |
05-01-12 02:46 PM
Quote from luckyputanski:
I'm the most psychologically stable of all of you...
And don't worry about me being bad trader...
I've been trading 8 years and I'm profitable...
Now, chop chop starting your own journal...
I'm sure I saw a post of yours where you claimed that your drawdown was 40%. Then obviously you either edited the post or had it removed. Regardless, this is not what is important here. You accused me first if you do not remember that. I was only trying to point to the fact that your drawdown was excessive and unreasonable by any standards. Then you said that your system can lose up to 70%. Obviously you are a psychologically unstable individual and you should seek help. The world is not against you. You are against this world. How can you claim that you have been trading for 8 years and you are profitable when your journal is losing 70% in 8 months? Have a doctor examine you before it is too late for you. This is friendly advice. One day you will wake up and scream "I am Napoleon the Great from Poland".
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
luckyputanski
Registered: Jul 2011
Posts: 335 |
05-01-12 06:45 PM
Quote from bwolinsky:
$500k to $200k is a 60% drawdown. In fact a $300,000 loss, so if you can't explain the fake equity curve you posted, that alone removes the legitimacy and premise of this thread, because that's not what I see here. I see a $300,000 loss and a 60% drawdown. You started at $500k, and now at $200k.
"Fake equity" - it's not fake, as much as it is a backtest of only S&P. Already explained that.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
luckyputanski
Registered: Jul 2011
Posts: 335 |
05-01-12 06:48 PM
Quote from alexvnew:
I'm sure I saw a post of yours where you claimed that your drawdown was 40%. Then obviously you either edited the post or had it removed. Regardless, this is not what is important here. You accused me first if you do not remember that. I was only trying to point to the fact that your drawdown was excessive and unreasonable by any standards. Then you said that your system can lose up to 70%. Obviously you are a psychologically unstable individual and you should seek help.
There is one post when I say I have 40% DD. Care to look what was my account value at the time?
2011 was bad for trend following, won't post a link here, but there is a blog that summarizes well known trend followers. Have a look. In 2011 I lost about 25%.
Yes, my system can have 70% drawdown. Are you claiming that I'm psychologically unstable because I can take more heat? If so - fine, if not - please explain.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
| Receive
an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing
to it. |
|
|
|
|
