 |
Rodney King
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 1725 |
06-23-11 01:21 PM
Quote from Ash1972:
Do we have any recent data on Seykota's fund performance? Over the last 15 years
Presumably it will be covered in Michael's new book(s).
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
Gabfly1
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 5295 |
06-23-11 02:19 PM
Quote from Rodney King:
Presumably it will be covered in Michael's new book(s).
You're a remarkable man, Rodney. You can be presumptuous and carry water at the same time.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
marketsurfer
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5403 |
06-26-11 03:14 PM
Hey Mike, just read the book excerpt--- thanks for the name check.... I don't believe I was ever acknowledged on a list that includes both Black Francis and Dr. Niederhoffer. I feel like a rock star .  
Surf 
Ps. The chapter list looks intriguing--- when is the book hitting the street?
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
bwolinsky
Registered: Jul 2008
Posts: 4546 |
06-27-11 10:23 AM
I can make this simple:
What is your mathematical, quantitative definition of trend?
There is not a definition written by you that is publicly available.
Perhaps math will reveal trend following commandments that must put a stop to nearly 11 winning trades in a row .
Mr. Covel, aside from marketing your media, do you have a constructive definition? I think the last thread failed because you did not provide one. I find real financial research is much more important than providing stories about other successful traders as in the excerpt for Trend Commandments.
It seems the excerpt ommitted these definitions, so if they do appear later, maybe you can give us some of that unique insight.
I find mathematical comprehension is not emphasized in any of your books, and objectively categorizing traders into trend followers because they were in trades that won for long periods of time is not how I would go about classifying any individual trader as such, and that seems to be what you did in your media.
So, how about it? Can you define mathematically what trend following is? I have all day and thousands of charts that say I know more than you, and, incidentally, so does ProfLogic.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
pwrtrdr
Registered: Nov 2008
Posts: 219 |
06-27-11 01:14 PM
Waiting on this response........ should be good
Quote from bwolinsky:
I can make this simple:
What is your mathematical, quantitative definition of trend?
There is not a definition written by you that is publicly available.
Perhaps math will reveal trend following commandments that must put a stop to nearly 11 winning trades in a row .
Mr. Covel, aside from marketing your media, do you have a constructive definition? I think the last thread failed because you did not provide one. I find real financial research is much more important than providing stories about other successful traders as in the excerpt for Trend Commandments.
It seems the excerpt ommitted these definitions, so if they do appear later, maybe you can give us some of that unique insight.
I find mathematical comprehension is not emphasized in any of your books, and objectively categorizing traders into trend followers because they were in trades that won for long periods of time is not how I would go about classifying any individual trader as such, and that seems to be what you did in your media.
So, how about it? Can you define mathematically what trend following is? I have all day and thousands of charts that say I know more than you, and, incidentally, so does ProfLogic.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
| Receive
an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing
to it. |
|
|
|
|
