 |
dc101
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 92 |
03-31-11 02:09 PM
I watched the video and didn't notice PTJ mention Gann at all. Segment talking about the crash of 1929 was just simple statistical correlation between that period and the present - not Gann. I also found some other PTJ interviews' transcripts online, no Gann again. Am I missing something?
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
Gabfly1
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 5295 |
03-31-11 05:36 PM
Quote from dc101:
I watched the video and didn't notice PTJ mention Gann at all. Segment talking about the crash of 1929 was just simple statistical correlation between that period and the present - not Gann. I also found some other PTJ interviews' transcripts online, no Gann again. Am I missing something?
I do believe you have a point. Upon reflection, I do not specifically recall any mention of Gann in the video, which I had not seen for some time. However, I do recall reference to Elliot. And, in fact, it was RCG Trader who made the Gann attribution to the video early on in this thread. I simply accepted his comment at face, assuming he had seen it more recently and had better recall, and because I automatically associate Elliot, Gann and Fibonacci numbers (as they relate to trading) as coming from the same chamber pot. After that, a couple of other posters repeated the Gann reference.
And so, until someone proves otherwise, by going through the video and noting the time of the alleged Gann reference, I do believe you have set us straight.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
RCG Trader
Registered: Dec 2009
Posts: 10079 |
03-31-11 05:43 PM
Quote from Gabfly1:
I do believe you have a point. Upon reflection, I do not specifically recall any mention of Gann in the video, which I had not seem for some time. However, I do recall reference to Elliot. And, in fact, it was RCG Trader who made the Gann attribution to the video early on in this thread. I simply accepted his comment at face, assuming he had seen it more recently and had better recall, and because I automatically associate Elliot, Gann and Fibonacci numbers (as they relate to trading) as coming from the same chamber pot. After that, a couple of other posters repeated the Gann reference.
And so, until someone proves otherwise, by going through the video and noting the time of the alleged Gann reference, I do believe you have set us straight.
You guys are quite right, he does not mention Gann, nor does he use any of his techniques that are clearly and irrefutably visible to you, as a consequence, you should definitely disregard all references to Gann or to any methods PTJ uses to trade in this thread
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
Gabfly1
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 5295 |
03-31-11 05:57 PM
Quote from RCG Trader:
You guys are quite right, he does not mention Gann, nor does he use any of his techniques that are clearly and irrefutably visible to you, as a consequence, you should definitely disregard all references to Gann or to any methods PTJ uses to trade in this thread
RCG, I can see by your nod/wink remark that you're bursting at the seams with all kinds of secret knowledge, as you "try" to misdirect us in your stage whisper. Even though:
Quote from RCG Trader:
...No need to worry, I can publish my entire system online, and I have no fear. Most people will not have the mental make-up to follow it, even if they do, when it has losses, they will attempt to alter it, to it's detriment...
And I thought Porky Pig was a ham actor. 
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
RCG Trader
Registered: Dec 2009
Posts: 10079 |
03-31-11 06:10 PM
Quote from Gabfly1:
RCG, I can see by your nod/wink remark that you're bursting at the seams with all kinds of secret knowledge, as you "try" to misdirect us in your stage whisper. Even though:
And I thought Porky Pig was a ham actor.
I know logic is an issue for you T-Dog, so I simply stated, that if you can't see it, then it isn't there for you. Everything I use is in public domain, but it does require an aptitude to process, and everyone just does not have that.
I was simply conceding the argument, that's all. Gann is quackery, and PTJ does not use it, okay, fine. I am not one to try to change people's perceptions of reality
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
Gabfly1
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 5295 |
03-31-11 06:15 PM
Very well. I wish you and your aptitude much happiness and success together. Not to mention those 30%+ days, which are evidently not at all unusual for you.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
| Receive
an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing
to it. |
|
|
|
|
