 |
Gabfly1
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 5295 |
06-16-11 11:07 PM
Quote from marketsurfer:
I am merely the messenger for the surf system...
Not a very good one if you can't or are unwilling to provide aggregate numbers. Why would a reader do your own homework for you? Again: do you not even know if you are net positive? And if you are, why is it so astonishingly difficult for you to provide cumulative numbers? Isn't record keeping one of the purposes of a journal? And if so, what makes it so prohibitively difficult for you to relay numbers that should be readily evident in your account statement. Assuming, of course, that there actually is an account statement. Please advise.
Quote from marketsurfer:
...My results have no relevance to you whatsoever...
Very true. But I should think that they would be relevant to you, and that aggregate numbers would provide you, and all the misguided people who follow you, with meaningful feedback. The question remains: why would you leave out this very pertinent information that should be at your very fingertips from your surf groupies? Do you think you'll ever get around to answering this question? (Personally, I'm no longer very hopeful.)
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
marketsurfer
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5403 |
06-16-11 11:16 PM
Quote from Rodney King:
Is the patented material included in the upcoming "Labeling Program - For Release JULY 1, 2010"?
It likely took too much computing power to "label" charts. Idea scrapped?
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
marketsurfer
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5403 |
06-16-11 11:39 PM
Quote from Gabfly1:
Not a very good one if you can't or are unwilling to provide aggregate numbers. Why would a reader do your own homework for you? Again: do you not even know if you are net positive? And if you are, why is it so astonishingly difficult for you to provide cumulative numbers? Isn't record keeping one of the purposes of a journal? And if so, what makes it so prohibitively difficult for you to relay numbers that should be readily evident in your account statement. Assuming, of course, that there actually is an account statement. Please advise.
Very true. But I should think that they would be relevant to you, and that aggregate numbers would provide you, and all the misguided people who follow you, with meaningful feedback. The question remains: why would you leave out this very pertinent information that should be at your very fingertips from your surf groupies? Do you think you'll ever get around to answering this question? (Personally, I'm no longer very hopeful.)
No, you are mistaken and regrettably totally misinformed. The public journal is to track th success and failure of th various surf systems. Surf systems attempt to forecast market direction before the fact therefore these calls are posted in public. Cumulative numbers or any numbers at all regarding my account size, exact profits and losses and other personal information is just that personal.
I know you are use to socialist worker party meetings in your comrades RV where everything is shared.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
Gabfly1
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 5295 |
06-16-11 11:44 PM
Quote from marketsurfer:
No, you are mistaken and regrettably totally misinformed. The public journal is to track th success and failure of th various surf systems. Surf systems attempt to forecast market direction before the fact therefore these calls are posted in public. Cumulative numbers or any numbers at all regarding my account size, exact profits and losses and other personal information is just that personal...
Let's see if I understand correctly. You make your calls and give either specific or general entry and exit timing, along with the number of contracts, and yet the aggregate performance information somehow still remains personal? How exactly does that work?
Quote from marketsurfer:
...I know you are use to socialist worker party meetings in your comrades RV where everything is shared.
And yet you are the one sharing your journal, such as it is. Ironic, wouldn't you say?
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
marketsurfer
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5403 |
06-16-11 11:49 PM
Quote from Gabfly1:
Let's see if I got this right. You make your calls and give either specific or general timing, along with the number of contracts, and the information somehow remains personal? How exactly does that work?
And yet you are the one sharing your journal, such as it is. Ironic, wouldn't you say?
Well I guess you could reverse engineer the trades and come up with a reasonable estimate sans commission and fees. If you feel this is relevant, feel free to keep a running tally of success and failure. It doesn't interest me to post the data directly due o the earlier explanation.
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
Neenisti
Registered: Mar 2011
Posts: 393 |
06-16-11 11:54 PM
Quote from Rodney King:
Is the patented material included in the upcoming "Labeling Program - For Release JULY 1, 2010"?
Upcoming . . . 2010?
You still got that toliet paper handy don't you?
|
| |
|
Edit/Delete • Quote • Complain |
| Receive
an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing
to it. |
|
|
|
|
