Forums > Bell Curve Money Management

 Nov 20th, 2002, 02:27 PM #1 Corso482     Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Austin, Tx Posts: 678 Alright, I'm about to spew some dilettante statistical theory. It may be completely bunk, but what the hell, that's what forums are for! Anyway, I'm going to posit that if you take a wide random sample of stocks, hold them for a set period of time, then plot their returns, the resulting chart would look like a bell curve. Few big losers/winners, the bulk of returns would be in the middle. (I'm assuming going long/short so that bull/bear markets won't skew the sample). So in the middle of the curve, your little winners cancel out your little losers. Then your stop loses turn your few big losers into little losers. All you are left with is your big winners that you let run i.e. your final profit. So if the markets were random and one trades a large enough sample of stocks, can we assume that one can still make a profit using proper money management? Quote
 Nov 20th, 2002, 02:38 PM #2 Aaron     Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Hartland, Wisconsin Posts: 1,047 Unfortunately no. You are just looking at the endpoint of the stock price's meanderings during your set period of time. During the set period of time some of your stocks are going to wander down to your stop loss price and then come back up again. With your stop loss you will be turning many break even trades and small winners into small losers. If the distribution of the stock price changes is gaussian (bell curve) with a mean of zero. Then your distribution of P&L's using your stop loss money management is going to be truncated on the negative side and positively skewed, but it is still going to have a mean of zero. Your average winner will be greater than your average loser, but you will have more losers than winners. Quote
 Nov 20th, 2002, 02:40 PM #3 acrary     Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 730 The distribution of returns for stocks is not representative of a bell curve. It's more like a Pareto-Levy distribution with fat tails and a smaller middle. Random studies have been done where stops were set to the lowest 20% of the returns and found to be consistently profitable using random entries. Quote
Nov 20th, 2002, 02:43 PM   #4
BKuerbs

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 531
Quote:
 Quote from acrary: The distribution of returns for stocks is not representative of a bell curve. It's more like a Pareto-Levy distribution with fat tails and a smaller middle. Random studies have been done where stops were set to the lowest 20% of the returns and found to be consistently profitable using random entries.
A hotly disputed theme. Do you have any link to such a study?

Many Thanks.

Bernd Kuerbs
Quote
Nov 20th, 2002, 02:48 PM   #5
Corso482

Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 678
Quote:
 Quote from Aaron: Unfortunately no. You are just looking at the endpoint of the stock price's meanderings during your set period of time. During the set period of time some of your stocks are going to wander down to your stop loss price and then come back up again. With your stop loss you will be turning many break even trades and small winners into small losers.
Ok, well then let's assume I am using a valid method to set my stops. So of those positions I enter, the vast majority when stopped out were going in the wrong direction. In other words, assume that when I get stopped out it's not premature and the stop prevented a larger loss. Then would bell curve money management still yield a profit in a random market?
Quote
 Nov 20th, 2002, 02:54 PM #6 ddefina     Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Washington State Posts: 945 I'll admit my system is based on this theory. Looking at this months results though would tend to support Aaron's theory. I try to breakeven in the chop and hold the outliers. The problem is no outliers this month, as well as poor discipline. I think you are on to something though in your theory. My system has had 13 profitable months in row using it. I'll predict this month will be profitable as well (for the system). Quote