ocean5
Registered: Feb 2012
Posts: 934 |
06-02-12 12:25 AM
Quote from SK0:
Hi Jack.
Below I attach an unresolved puzzle that you gave to me at the beginning of this year.
____________________________________________________
Want to see something?
sym>>> FTP>>>>XB.
sym>> FTP>>>hitch>>>>ST R.
sym>>>FTP>>>>>hitch>>>ST R>>>>>OB B.
Lets add some strings of bars with semi colons:
sym>>> FTP>>>>XB; sym>>> FTP>>>XB; FTP>>>XB; XB: XB; FTP.
sym>> FTP>>>hitch>>>>ST R; FBP>>XR; XR.
sym>>>FTP>>>>>hitch>>>ST R>>>>>OB B; FTP>>>XB.
It must be gibberish cause I wrote it.
What would it be like if all conventional formations were written in terms of Boolean vectors? I know, easy to program as inductive back testing.....LOL....
__________________________________________________
Could you please give another more explicit stroke on how to use the logging of forming-bar's mutation cases to do intrabar MADA sweep? What is the purpose to compare a forming bar to prior closed bar?
I also attach your log here that you may need to use to elaborate.
Thank you for the help.
wtf is that meeeeeeaaaaaan???????xr,xb???
Paddler,young deceitful fook,Don Altabelo you fook!!
|
