HOME FORUMS BROKERS SOFTWARE BOOKS CONTACT US
Elite Trader Your Account  •  Become a Member  •  Help  •  Search    
    Forums ›› Technically Speaking ›› Automated Trading ›› running esignal on a windows cloud server  


Post A Reply
    Page 1 of 5:   1  2  3  4  5  
Runningbear
 

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1689

 

07-20-12 02:05 PM

This is not quite an automated trading question but a step on my journey to full automated. I currently use esignal for generating trade signals and I'm thinking of running the application from a windows cloud server.

This way I can ensure maximum internet uptime for rock solid signal reliability. Plus I can use esignal from my mac or ipad using remote login.

The problem I'm having is that I'm trying to calculate my likely monthly cost for such a server.

Cloud companies like Opsource charge per cpu. My i7 chip in my home computer spikes to 15% every couple of minutes. The rest of the time its at zero. If my i7 chip has 4 cores, what would this convert to in terms of cpu requirement for a cloud based server? Is this still 1 cpu? Or does a 4 core cpu convert to 4 cpu's in a cloud set up?

Thanks in advance for any help.

Runningbear

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
Runningbear
 

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1689

 

07-21-12 12:51 PM

Anyone. Anyone at all.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
ProTrader432
 

Registered: Feb 2011
Posts: 28

 

07-21-12 04:51 PM

Give Windows Azure a try.

http://www.windowsazure.com/

The Advantage is that you can test it out three months for free

I use it for my Algo Servers and it's great

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
WinstonTJ
 

Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 1947

 

07-22-12 05:10 AM

VMs and Bare Metal are truly different animals.

If you are going automated you can either get free VM trials or you should know what the system requirements are. They perform just like a desktop in terms of used/free resources but they also can run at optimized speeds.

You can't really compare them.

I host VMs for a couple hedge funds. If you want you are more than welcome to demo a dual core vs. a quad core VM running VMware ESXi 5.0. You are more than welcome to do benchmarks and other tests to just get a feel for what the VMs do in terms of horsepower vs. a desktop. (virtual vs. bare metal)

If you say yes to the offer I will say I'd feel most comfortable if you didn't put anything sensitive or proprietary on there.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
amazingIndustry
 

Registered: Aug 2009
Posts: 570

 

07-22-12 09:31 AM

...because they are demo or is this your general business policy?

Do you have a link to get some info on pricing for your services?

Thanks



Quote from WinstonTJ:

VMs and Bare Metal are truly different animals.

If you are going automated you can either get free VM trials or you should know what the system requirements are. They perform just like a desktop in terms of used/free resources but they also can run at optimized speeds.

You can't really compare them.

I host VMs for a couple hedge funds. If you want you are more than welcome to demo a dual core vs. a quad core VM running VMware ESXi 5.0. You are more than welcome to do benchmarks and other tests to just get a feel for what the VMs do in terms of horsepower vs. a desktop. (virtual vs. bare metal)

If you say yes to the offer I will say I'd feel most comfortable if you didn't put anything sensitive or proprietary on there.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
WinstonTJ
 

Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 1947

 

07-23-12 01:11 PM


Quote from amazingIndustry:

...because they are demo or is this your general business policy?

Do you have a link to get some info on pricing for your services?

Thanks


I don't know what your issue is with me but following me around and posting aggrevating comments is getting really old.

You clearly don't know much about virtualization if you are asking or implying that a VM is only slower because it's in a demo environment.

To answer your question, bare metal will always be faster. The hypervisor takes up some system resources as well as introduces some latency. If you were to benchmark two identical systems, one bare metal and one with any flavor hypervisor (vmware, citrix, Xen) the bare metal box would always be slightly faster.

Regarding proprietary info installed to a demo VM, they are equally as safe as production. I just say that so that #1 there is no confusion going forward about who's property is who's and #2 if you are getting a demo it should be for testing compatibility and connectivity, not for programming & development.

    Edit/Delete Quote Complain
    Page 1 of 5:   1  2  3  4  5  
Post A Reply


Receive an email whenever a new post is added to this thread by subscribing to it.
 
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:
 

 

   Conduct Rules  -  Privacy Policy  -  Day Trader -  Day Trader Forum -  Best Trading Software -  Sitemap Copyright © 2013, Elite Trader. All rights reserved.    
 
WHILE YOU'RE HERE, TAKE A MINUTE TO VISIT SOME OF OUR SPONSORS:
Advantage Futures
Futures Brokerage & Clearing
AMP Global Clearing
Futures and FX Trading
Bright Trading
Professional Equities Trading
CTS
Futures Trading Software
DaytradingBias.com
Professional Trading Analytics
ECHOtrade
Professional Trading Firm
eSignal
Trading Software Provider
FXCM
Forex Trading Services
Global Futures
Futures, Options & FX Trading
Interactive Brokers
Pro Gateway to World Markets
JC Trading Group
Direct Access Trading
MB Trading
Direct Access Trading
MultiCharts
Trading Software Provider
NinjaTrader
Trading Software Provider
OANDA
Currency Trading
optionshouse
Option Trading & Education
Rithmic
Futures Trade Execution Platform
SpeedTrader
Direct Access Trading
SpreadProfessor
Spread Trading Instruction
thinkorswim by TD Ameritrade
Direct Access TradingAdvertisement
TradersStudio
System Building & Backtesting
Trading Technologies
Trading Software Provider
Trend Following
Trading Systems Provider