FORUMS BROKERS SOFTWARE
Home
 
    Forums > Trading for a Living > Journals > Universal Trend Trading

Old Feb 22nd, 2012, 05:38 PM   #127
luckyputanski
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 371
Sold GbpUsd @ 1.56642

Account Value 216k
    Quote
Old Feb 22nd, 2012, 11:02 PM   #128
achilles28
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,119
Quote:
Quote from luckyputanski:

I trade a single trend following strategy, backtested on 40 years of data. If I come up with something better, I will change, but so far - that's the best I have.
How is trend defined?
    Quote
Old Feb 23rd, 2012, 02:16 PM   #129
luckyputanski
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 371
Quote:
Quote from achilles28:

How is trend defined?
I can't disclose system's details at the moment, but I look at very long term trends. My longest look up period is 1 year.
    Quote
Old Feb 24th, 2012, 01:03 PM   #130
luckyputanski
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 371
Closed GbpUsd with loss -2592

Account Value 210k
    Quote
Old Feb 27th, 2012, 12:36 PM   #131
luckyputanski
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 371
Closed fbudn10 with profit +1435
I've decided that I won't be trading this symbol.

Account Value 214k
    Quote
Old Feb 27th, 2012, 01:50 PM   #132
masterm1ne
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 933
Quote:
Quote from luckyputanski:

An interesting theory, but I find it difficult to believe. If a strategy was working 40 years on dozens of markets (and then checked for fun on different markets - working there as well) and had a new equity high not so long ago (just after I started this journal), I find it hard to believe that it stopped working exactly now. It is possible, but come on, what are the odds?
You might have fallen victim, like many have, to the illusion that backtesting something must mean that it will work the same way in a forward test. The past 40 years will not be like the next 40, or the next 400. There is a reason the government requires the disclaimer ",past performance is not indicative of future results" for anyone attempting to sell their BS. Think hard about that.

Basically anything on past data is curve fit... this creates a giant problem. Do you think curve fitting is reduced by using more data? Could it make your backtest even worse? The answer is, yes, possibly. The fact is you don't know. Anything is possible.

I don't know the details of your system, but personally, from the personal real money I've traded, using nothing but logical risk managment you should never have a 50% drawdown... My entries have not been near what a full time trader could do with unlimited capiltal, yet still I haven't experienced a 50% drawdown in 9 months (yes this is a short amount of time). I have traded (most likely over-leveraged) a very small account of 10k-24k.

Remember, a good trade will never go far against you and the only constant is change. I'd be intersted if the system shows 50%+ drawdowns. Is it price based? If you are a long term trader, why are you in and out of positions that show profit within days?
    Quote
 
Reply
Thread Tools

Forum Jump



   Conduct Rules   Privacy Policy   Sitemap Copyright © 2014, Elite Trader. All rights reserved.   

WHILE YOU'RE HERE, TAKE A MINUTE TO VISIT SOME OF OUR SPONSORS:
Advantage Futures
Futures Trading & Clearing
AMP Global Clearing
Futures and FX Trading
Collective2
Automated Trading Services
CTS
Futures Trading Software
dom993trading.com
NinjaTrader Consulting
eSignal
Trading Software Provider
FXCM
Forex Trading Services
Global Futures
Futures, Options & FX Trading
Interactive Brokers
Pro Gateway to World Markets
JC Trading Group
Direct Access Trading
MB Trading
Direct Access Trading
NinjaTrader
Trading Software Provider
optionshouse
Option Trading & Education
Rithmic
Futures Trade Execution Platform
SpeedTrader
Direct Access Trading
SpreadProfessor
Spread Trading Instruction
thenut-trader.com
FX, Gold, & Stock Signals
TradersStudio
System Building & Backtesting
Tradier
Equity and Options Trading
Trading Technologies
Trading Software Provider