 "Rock Solid and Reliable" - ofurbaldur | July 08, 2008 3:51 AM |
|
| |
 |
| Reliability |
 |
| Ease of Use |
|
| Performance |
|
| Documentation |
|
| Worth the Money |
|
|
CQG is rock solid and reliable. Data centers in all regions. Superior customer service 24/6 round the clock. Any futures trader making at least $700 per day on average should consider this program. Just love it. |
| | |
|
| |
|
| Reliability |
|
| Ease of Use |
|
| Performance |
|
| Documentation |
|
| Worth the Money |
|
|
I discovered CQG when I started working at the CME as a clerk. Got spoiled. Have tried e-signal, aspen, some other prop software but nothing comes close. If your a serious trader this is a must |
| | |
| "Great, but over the last 3 months, lots of issues." - buylo | June 02, 2006 7:30 AM |
|
| |
|
| Reliability |
 |
| Ease of Use |
 |
| Performance |
|
| Documentation |
 |
| Worth the Money |
|
|
I enjoy CQG, but lately I have had issues with the data feed. Are they resting on their laurels? |
| | |
| "Pluses and minuses" - cmaxb | March 16, 2006 8:55 AM |
|
| |
|
| Reliability |
|
| Ease of Use |
|
| Performance |
|
| Documentation |
|
| Worth the Money |
|
|
Pros: Solid datafeed, most of the bells and whistles you come to expect from charting packages. Good phone support
Cons: Price. Backtesting is an extra $250/m. No way to configure candlesticks (just up/down color). No sub-one minute charts. When you cancel, you have to pay for the next 30 days. |
| | |
| "Is the best , but do they know it?" - fabrizio | December 07, 2005 2:10 PM |
|
| |
|
| Reliability |
|
| Ease of Use |
|
| Performance |
|
| Documentation |
|
| Worth the Money |
|
|
"Nothing Compares 2 U" Always the best. Still the benchamark but still a closed system.And the people of CQG , they always need time to take the decision to decide....
Please stay focused on your "cible", and let the execution platforms to the specialists. |
| | |
Not Recommended
