Prop Firms taking deposits

Discussion in 'Prop Firms' started by elliots11, Dec 25, 2014.

  1. Hi,

    Based upon my research there are only a few legitimate prop firm that will sponser for the 56 and take deposit. Here is my list:

    T3 and its subsidiaries including Integra and JC Trading and WTS 5k deposit.
    Bright Trading 50k deposit

    Are there others that should be added to this list?

    Thanks
     
  2. 1245

    1245

    I'm not a prop guy, but if you describe your situation in detail, maybe someone can help. It would help to know:

    -how much of a deposit you can make
    -what you trade
    -are you in the USA
    -do you want remote or a trading room

    If you don't offer details, no one here will be able to make a good suggestion.
     
  3. Fair enough I am looking for firms that accept 5-10k, allow you to trade remote, trade equities and/or options. I am in the USA. Basically I am looking for alternatives if there are any to the ones that I listed.
     
  4. Maverick 74 is generally up to date on prop firms. Asking him is probably your best bet on ET.
     
    elliots11 likes this.
  5. zmiws

    zmiws

    Chimera Securities
     
  6. Avatar Securities
    Quasar Trading
    Hold Brothers

    All require the Series 56.

    The remaining were already mentioned: T3/WTS, Bright, and Chimera.
     
  7. elliots11 likes this.
  8. Interesting that they DID pay the first installment of over $500k, and they DID pay their Class B members (see item 31 in the complaint, link below).

    However, I'm not sure you're aware that Hold Brothers has TWO companies, Hold Brothers Online Investment Services ("Hold Brothers") and Hold Brothers Capital, LLC. The complaint deals with the FINRA firm (now terminated). The licensed Series 56 prop traders are members of Hold Brothers Capital, not Hold Brothers, which is the firm mentioned in the SEC complaint. Also, if you do a FINRA broker check, it clearly says that Hold Brothers does not owe any customers any money. In other words, customers got their money back, and Hold Brothers also paid $1.4 million to twenty three Class B traders who had equity stakes in Hold Brothers.

    I guess the SEC still wants the remaining $2 million in fines that Hold Brothers agreed to pay in the settlement. Maybe they get it eventually, maybe not. When you look at damages, who really suffered as a result of their "spoofing" activities? The SEC? The exchanges? Gimme a break!

    Here's a suggestion for the SEC: if you end up getting the remaining $2 million out of the Hold Brothers, then maybe you can do your jobs, and provide relief to those who suffered REAL damages, the former Team Trading traders, many who never got their money back.

    http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2014/comp23143.pdf
     
    Loooppy99 and elliots11 like this.
  9. Cmoss

    Cmoss


    For being a forum sponsor, you would think they would have more information available here.
     
  10. dealmaker

    dealmaker

    Bright's pay outs are 100%, not straight forward but still 100% others are not....
     
    #10     Feb 13, 2015